- 288 Posts
- 452 Comments
11·4 days agoI want to know how someone figured this out. Were they accidentally playing it at the same time or just noticed something was rhythmic and then tried different songs?
13·4 days agoYour number will almost certainly be given to a variety of republican campaigns and see spam from many different numbers. Good luck blocking all of them
Realistically, it most likely signs you up for a deluge of spam texts about donations and the like to trump
“Concepts of a plan” is probably the best quote imo
13·5 days agoThere already sort of is one in the US for candidates who exceed a certain threshold of the vote. It comes with spending limits that could be exceeded by a lot by raising money outside it, so parties stopped taking it. Plus tax payers have to opt into doing it, and the rates of people doing so have dropped over time
If you’ve ever filed US income taxes and seen the question
“Do you want $3 of your federal tax to go to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund”
That’s what it’s referring to
I think you forgot a zero there or added an extra one to the dollar amount. 47 million / 600 thousand = $78.3333 per person
Average is much more reasonable
* the biggest reason being that the Supreme Court overturned a prior law to stop super pacs from having unlimited spending in Citizen United. Sure, maybe Congress could pass the same law again only for the court to overturn it 6-3
You have to fix the Supreme Court for that. It’d be difficult to regulate spending in primaries either because money is “free speech” according to them
Before someone else mentions it:
Yes it would be better to not have a system that needs so much money, but until citizens united is overturned it unfortunately still matter. Plus there being more small donors is good news since it helps campaigns be less reliant on big money
No more presidential debates, but there’s still the VP debate unless JD Vance backs out (which he might)
Couldn’t even commit to the “concepts of a plan” for a second debate
Let’s extend that. Vote, get active, get involved
18·5 days agoLet’s make sure it is. Vote, get active, get involved
I’m sure their “concepts of a plan” had it really all thought out
*Trump said he had a “concept of a plan” for replacing Obama care (i.e he has no plan)
For the lazy
Not mentioned in the article, but Trafalgar, who is notorious for heavily skewing republican is also saying voters think Harris won the debate by a large margin
I should have checked further, oops, I changed the title
70·6 days agoThey are actually stating that back up again
Not OP, but just made a version of this post that doesn’t give any traffic to elon musk
I’d be inclined to agree. “They’re eating the dogs” is also a good contender to anyone not into misinformation and racism
It’s based on the quote he said where he said he “created stories”