Someone here said NetBSD could work. Another person sent a link to someone who did manage to get linux on a floppy disk, that could work.

Honestly I have no idea. It’s further down on my want-to-do list, and the only thing I can personally think of (without having done any research on it) is like linux from scratch, or a similar source version where I disable almost every kernel feature, and suffer through finding the right settings to enable for this hardware.

Confirmed

Both sites appear to work for me.

The shareholders probably care, but to the layman, expecting 6.61 billion and only earning 6.49 billion doesn’t amount to much. They’re not going anywhere.

I think they should be allowed. Retro/Vintage is a theme. We still buy gasoline, but there’s always vintage gas pumps in antique shops and they’re cool to see. Same with vintage coke products.

This is the way

tldr, not sure if it was bullet or shrapnel from the bullet.

Standard operating procedure for high school

Kind of. That was a little different though, it wasn’t an accident. Boiling coffee was just standard procedure for McDonalds. So I agree she was right to sue.

It’s not even a good excuse because even if they did change their minds, he could still attempt to debate whoever it is on the scheduled date.

Try adding USER root before the mkdir.

Also, just in general, when debugging container files, I comment out the failing line and set my command to tail -F /dev/null, then you can build and run the container and exec <container> bash and try to manually run the commands that are failing.

A guy ate boneless wings and got a bone stuck in his throat leading to multiple surgeries so he sued. But he didn’t notice when it happened?

The longer I think about this the more I agree with the decision. It sounds dumb, there shouldn’t be bones, but if you’re chopping up a chicken breast with the rib bones still attached, I could see how a bone could accidentally make its way into a nugget. So I can understand what they mean by saying it’s a cooking style.

So honest, you have my vote!

I don’t know why you’re being downvoted here. I thought a lot of the audience here was relatively informed on what it’s like to work in IT/programming. Where we do what we can to make sure all our updates go well, but things slip through the cracks.

This was a massive fuckup, but it’s likely not that different than pushing a bug to prod, it just so happens that their prod has such a huge audience. I would hope they have very strict rules about what gets in, but I can also respect that no matter how many processes you put in place to make sure bad things don’t happen, problems can still make it through.

Crowdstrike should be held to a higher standard of course, because of how impactful these mistakes can be for their software. And it’s pretty crazy that something this bad slipped through. But I wouldn’t jump to criminal negligence here without more information.

p.s. I’m not saying CEOs / corps should not be held accountable. They should be. And CEOs do have the power to drive the company into criminal acts and they should be held accountable with jail time for that. I’m just saying I don’t think that’s the case here.

I agree, this usage of it was bad.

They would have been focusing on “AI” since before chatgpt/genAI.

This is a place where you actually do want machine learning to categorize threats. This is a different ai than chatgpt ai. We just call everything AI now cus why not.

But yea, they fucked up.

Now the internet needs to rollback to pre-google times. Where you have a human-curated and organized list of useful sites.

I think you have something else… i also have astigmatism, but circles don’t look like eggs, with or without glasses.

This applies to all these diets, not just calorie counting. “Don’t eat carbs”, “don’t eat fats”, “don’t eat processed foods” are all different ways of saying “You just have to raise your elevation.”

They all imply there’s just one singular thing you have to do, but they’re not sustainable.

Your conclusion is great, it’s all about designing a sustainable diet for yourself that works.

For those interested, science vs is a great podcast where they review the latest research studies and interview scientists publishing papers about various topics, with all their sources cited.

They have a few weight loss/diet episodes, and while everyone here is correct about how different food has different impacts on the body, it seems like science always concludes that losing weight comes from eating less food no matter the diet.

So while this post may be oversimplified, if your goal is just to lose weight, it’s not wrong. Maybe not healthy, but not wrong.

The podcast is targeted at the layman, so it’s not just boring academics talking about things, check it out.