huge demand
Yeah, barely even clearing the 5% threshold is “huge demand”. Like, when they even can’t cut it in a failed state like Sachsen-Anhalt, the threat of BSW is de facto nonexistant. It can’t work anyway, like trying to have slightly progressive economy politics and hard right societal politics is a contradiction which can’t be really solved.
That’s one of the hardest things to decide whether i<10, i=10 or whether i even starts at 0. That means I have to think for like a second.
Granted, a LLM gets it just as wrong as I do, but then it’s not my bug anymore, it was the LLMs fault ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
Weil SPD und Grüne “Spitzenpolitiker” gar keine ernsthafte progressive Politik wollen, aber wissen, dass das durchaus einem Teil ihrer Basis und Wählerschaft nicht schmeckt.
Man kann ja als SPD und Grüne bspw. schlecht sagen “Ne, Volksentscheide möchten wir gerne ignorieren”. Also muss man so einen Scheiß machen.
Geilo. Wird wie bei der Vermögensteuer laufen. BVerfG sagt “das ist Mist, Gesetzgeber, mach’ das neu und besser”, und Merz wird, statt Eier zu lecken (was er eigentlich tun sollte), die Erhebung einfach suspendieren 😎👍.
Erm, a “dual target” is different from “we want to eliminate this military installation, but we cannot avoid hitting civilians with our current capabilities”. Dual target means exactly that “we want to hit civilian stuff just as much as military targets”.
Um, but did anyone piss on the moon? Feels like it’s hard to whip your dick out of a space suit. And they even filmed it, for the world to watch?
Der sagt wahrscheinlich “Ah, hier ist noch eine bisher übersehene Sozialleistung für…blinde Kinder aus einkommensschwachen Haushalten…die wir noch kürzen können!”
I don’t know where this “they tried hitting war infrastructure” myth comes from.
Same with the bombing in Germany. They literally rebuild German city houses in the desert, to figure out the best way how to blow off the roof and set the wooden structures inside on fire.
They measured fire brigade response times to stage the bombing in a way to hit the rescue efforts.
It was about demoralizing the civil populace, so of course it was never about military targets.
I mean, would be neat to make something like “I want to fly there, so give me options, check also for rental cars and vacation homes with this-and-those constraints, give me a list and prices” and have it have a go on it. That would really make family vacation easier if I could trust the results.
But, lo and behold, I cannot trust the results at all, so it keeps being a fantasy (which destroys the world in the meantime, like, ecologically and economically). Then again: after destroying everything, no need for family vacation planning, so, yeah?
Jawohl, so entstehen die besten Bratkartoffeln. Braucht man aber Geduld.
Once worked for a company that did so. Was the fittest in my life. I guess also the most productive ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
It’s the US. The only safe way to kill her is to send her into a child daycare or school and let the missiles do their job.
Of all the proven ways to end a life quickly and (for all we know) relatively painless that is what you came up with? 😅
But it says cruel and unusual, not cruel or unusual. So, if it is a usual punishment, it can be as cruel as you want.
Checkmate civilized world 😎.
Wir waren am Samstag Drachen steigen lassen. Welch schönes Klischee-Kinder-Amüsement. War sonnig, war windig genug, schickschick.
Leider sind meine Frau und ich jetzt schwer erkältet (letzte Woche die Kinder). Immerhin hatten wir ein beinahe krankheitsfreies Wochenende zwischendrin.
Nobody remembers anything anymore, feels like. Back in the day, when Nord Stream was envisioned, the public opinion on Ukraine in Germany was “that is this corrupt post-soviet cleptocracy which steals our gas from transit pipelines”. Like, there were Russian AND German official investigations which came to the conclusion, that there’s gas going amiss during transit.
The whole gang who’s now into “Nord Stream was so wrong” basically was on a witch hunt against “those Ukrainian thieves, who steal our gas”, all those tabloids, media and everybody, which are now oh so smart about it 🙄.
Yeah, because breaking the inflation pressure is always on the workforce, never on the companies.
I only ever heard “you should abstain from wanting higher salaries, 'cause inflation”. Never has a politician or economist said “companies should abstain from raising prices, 'cause inflation” ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
“Yeah, besides those integral parts of our costs, we’re profitable”
😅.
It’s like a hair dresser saying “If I don’t count the rent of my shop and all the supplies, I’m profitable”.