Actors say Hollywood studios want their AI replicas — for free, forever - eviltoast

“This ‘groundbreaking’ AI proposal that they gave us yesterday, they proposed that our background performers should be able to be scanned, get one day’s pay, and their companies should own that scan, their image, their likeness and should be able to use it for the rest of eternity on any project they want, with no consent and no compensation. So if you think that’s a groundbreaking proposal, I suggest you think again.”

  • dudebro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, a living in one of the most expensive cities in the world.

    You could be living a cheaper life anywhere else, but you feel entitled to live in LA.

    No sympathy from me. Spread out.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live in a cheaper place now. Indiana. My quality of life is not especially different. I didn’t feel entitled to live in L.A., I went where I could put my skills to good use. Being paid a low wage in L.A. was a higher wage than a low wage in Indiana, but the cost of living is also higher.

      Maybe don’t make guesses about how other people live their lives.

      And let me guess- I shouldn’t have moved to Indiana, I should have moved to Botswana or something if I don’t want to feel “entitled.”

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So I don’t feel “entitled” to live in a first-world country where I have things like running water and electricity? Seems like the same sort of “entitled” as living in a city where you have a job that you think is the best job for what you want to do with your life. Shouldn’t I be working in a strip mine in Mongolia or not ever complain about my life?

          Or is Los Angeles somehow a special case?

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I just said Indiana was fine.

            California is the most expensive state to live in. People don’t need to live there and would be using capital more efficiently elsewhere.

            I’m not in the camp of “all or nothing.” I think magnitude matters and we can all be doing more to reduce the disparity in wealth besides “making more money.”

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              If California was totally depopulated, another state would be the most expensive state and you could make the same claim.

              • dudebro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not really. It’s supply and demand. Even if another state were the new most expensive, that doesn’t mean it will be as expensive as California is now.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay, what is the acceptable level of “expensive” where people have a right to complain about not being paid enough?

                  • dudebro@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Anyone who makes more wealth than average gets no sympathy from me when complaining about money.

                    However, anyone has the ‘right’ to complain about anything. It’s called freedom of speech.