Trying to reverse climate change won’t save us, scientists warn - eviltoast
  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your response was

    It’s not about necessary jobs, it’s about paying into social security / pensions.

    In my answer those are two topics that are not directly related, although they are linked by both having to do with the economy.

    Hence I gave responses to both topics.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The “necessary jobs” topic is unrelated to the “fund pensions” topic. And the “fund pensions” topic is the one that’s being discussed in relation to population control.

      You brought up a completely irrelevant topic, that’s what I’m saying.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It comes full circle because the proposed solution is to increase the number of people who are able to work, with the idea that those people will take on more jobs, and those jobs will fund pensions.

        I think this is a bad idea because we already have more workers than useful jobs. An increase in the population wont really help.