Trying to reverse climate change won’t save us, scientists warn - eviltoast
  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I literally said just having less children.

    And I’m totally ok to only having between one or zero children myself.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      China tried it, didn’t go too well… good luck trying it on a global scale…

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Chinas problem was also a still very uneducated and traditionalist populace, that insisted on having boys as heirs. Leading to abortions or straight up murder of female infants. That wouldn’t really be a global issue I beleive

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Derived problems were product of a sexist society should be avoidable, you know, ending sexism…

        Or are you supporting that people should be able to want male babies over female ones?

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oooooh, of course, how could i forget? Blame the cis white male and the patriarchy, or course!

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Literally the only big problem with china one-child policy, was that sexist parents were practicing selective abortions to ensure that they get one male kid.

            No sexism = no problem