What belief do you have two-sided opinions on? - eviltoast

Mine is retail work. Yeah I get it. You hate it. There isn’t anything that I hadn’t heard before about it by now that hasn’t already been said. Yup, people suck.

But on the same token, I don’t really appreciate the level people go to, to dissuade people from getting into retail work. Job is a job and income is income. You’ll need both of these things. I’ve learned that a lot of the time, people just happen to be employed by shitty stores that are managed by power-tripping people or maybe the team they work with are annoyingly incompetent.

Yet if you manage to find a store that’s worth working in, it’s worth it for however long you want to be there for. I chose to work for retail. I don’t mind the labor. I don’t want a sit-down desk job.

And yeah I work for a big company that has questionable values and has destroyed communities. But that’s really out of my control and because that I work for said company, does not necessarily mean that I agree with it or side with the corporate standards. If I wanted to, I’d go back to school and find something else to do.

And that’s what I advise people to do if they’re so tired of their retail job. Go back to school, it’s really all you can do other than go to trade school to get skills and branch into different careers. Just removed about it all day is not going to do a thing. I used to be like that but all it does was just make me hate everything and there were a couple points where I could’ve gotten fired over it. It’s not worth getting fired over something you don’t really have an investment in.

  • Zorg@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    Death penalty

    On one hand, I don’t believe capital punishment has any place in civilized society.
    On the other, there are some in-human people (serial killers mainly, but including e.g. CEOs who have caused thousands of deaths to increase profits), where it just seems a waste of everyone’s time, to lock them away in a cell for decades. Some people are just completely beyond rehabilitation, and if they are proven guilty with 99.9+% certainty, what’s the point of locking then up and waiting for old age to do the job?

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem with the death penalty is largely down to potential miscarriages of justice.

      What if they get the wrong person and some innocent is put to death? Do you really want the state to have that sort of power over its citizens?

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s been two cases of this happening very recently that’s been making the rounds on Lemmy. Two dudes on death row, new evidence comes up that puts their guilty judgement into question and their execution proceeds anyway.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Didn’t only one of the executions proceed? I thought one was stayed (but maybe it still happened later, idk)

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is significantly cheaper to keep someone in prison for life than the death sentence process.

      • FeelzGoodMan420
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you have a source for that? I’m genuinely curious. Because I thought about that a lot too and I would have assumed that it costs way more to keep someone alive, fed, and supervised for 50 years vs. a death penalty.

        • saigot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Here is amnesty international

          It basically comes down to trials being far more expensive , the required solitary confinement being more expensive, more appeals. Lawyers cost much more than prison meals.

          • FeelzGoodMan420
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Thanks! Yea that’s super important information and this changes my opinion on that because I was thinking about cost.

    • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like life imprisonment for heinous people specifically because it seems like the less merciful option. Look at how many mass shooters and terrorists also take their own lives during the act - suicide is one of their objectives. If we can capture them alive and make them live in a small room, eating unexciting food and sleeping on thin mattresses for decades still to come - that’s the ultimate rebuke to their ideologies of death. Execution, on the other hand, is giving them what they seek.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Plus the amount of money that gets sunk into looking after their old murdering asses.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same, I don’t necessarily think it prevents any crimes from happening, but there are some individuals who will provide nothing back to society that could possibly make up for what they’ve done, and their continued existence is a threat to those around them that have to deal with them on a daily basis.

      BUT until the criminal justice system can be reformed or provide more equatable justice, I don’t know that we can 100% say everyone on death penalty deserves it. I don’t know how we fix it, but it shouldn’t be left to private individuals or groups to have to exonerate people on death row.

    • TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I believe that the death penalty is worthless.

      If the crime is bad enough to kill a person anyway, why waste their productive potential? Same for locking those people up for life instead.

      The mines yearn for the labour of the bourgeois.

    • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In order to get 99.9% certainty, 1) you are saying you are willing to have one in a thousand death penalties against innocents, and 2) that requires a system made of people to do their job correctly 99.9% of the time. I dont think there is a job on earth that people in a large group can do that well.