whyyyy, that doesn't make any sense... - eviltoast
  • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if I told you there were a lot of folks who hate both tankies and capitalism.

    In fact, most anti-capitalists are also anti-authoritarian, which leaves them out of the tankie camp.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m gonna list all the good and progressive things about North Korea that America needs to emulate if it wants to stop being a Capitalist Demon Machine

          Thank you for reading my list!

          • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Please give a warning for whiplash

            !Also, put a bullet point to start a list, because the empty paragraph doesn’t appear on my end. If you want to that is!<

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool, but then you’re just a naive utopia dreamer. Capitalism is the best system we have right now, and it pays for a lot of social programs, can it be better sure but acting like communism is better is just flat out stupid.

      • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is the best system we have right now

        Citation needed. Also, curious how capitalist countries are always so eager to stomp down any attempt at trying a different system, almost as if the rich really don’t want you to even believe a different system is possible 🤔

        and it pays for a lot of social programs

        It doesn’t pay, it steals. Social programs under capitalism are possible only by exploiting the global south.

        Cool, but then you’re just a naive utopia dreamer.

        Not wanting to be robbed by bosses and landlords is utopia, now? And you talk about it as if it was some theory that was never tried. Libertarian socialism already exists.

        can it be better sure but acting like communism is better is just flat out stupid.

        Because…? Can you even define what you mean with ‘communism’, or is it just some nebulous threat you got programmed to be afraid of? Not all socialists are Stalinists, which is what you seem to be implying…

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is naivest utopia. There is no invisible limbs, monopoly will eventually form.

      • explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Living in a tribe in the jungle is better than capitalism because it’s not literally destroying the world. If you’re willing to consider utopian capitalism, then a utopia based on ideas that can theoretically work should be even easier.

        • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          A big meteor strike would be worse for most life on earth than even the climate crisis, and that will happen, sooner or later. In order to prevent that, you need a pretty high tech level.

          • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes and no. Yes by the time it would likely be detected on a collision course with Earth, at present, even the greatest minds can’t theorize a method to neutralize an asteroid => 5km in diameter that doesn’t cause an extinction event with the technology available to us right now.

            However, if it were detected soon enough there may be more tenable options for preventing an impact event that are not futile. The problem is we don’t have nearly enough resources monitoring deep space for our inevitable destruction and with a lot of our space tech now being privatized in the US it will be more difficult because there’s no profit incentive to being prepared for our doom. At least now that NASA is active again there will be an obvious taxpayer incentive to literally preventing our own annihilation…lol

            Edit to add article about early detection: https://www.planetary.org/defending-the-earth-from-impacts#:~:text=We can stop asteroids from,tends to focus on asteroids.

            • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The point is you aren’t going to stop an asteroid if you’re living in a tribe in the jungle.

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s a dumb point. Might as well do nothing and continue to ravage the planet because there will be a meteorite somewhere in the next millions year.

                • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That doesn’t follow. If you care about whether or not humanity survives, those are not equivalent at all.

              • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, but my point is that capitalism may as well be George of the jungle with everything it does to trade our future for revenue growth.