American military doctrine - eviltoast
  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    This post is already too credible, so what the fuck, I might as well continue to dishonor it’s noncredibility even further.

    You can’t really compare a modern major Arab army, to a western army. They serve different functions.

    Major Arab armies, at least contemporary ones, are designed to primarily preserve the internal social order and hierarchy. They’re internal security forces, with war planes and tanks.

    Which presents another problem, coup d’etats. You can’t risk your command staff aligning against your ruling class, or monarch, so they should not trained, or inclined, to cooperate too much. So you put rivals in charge a different branches, and make sure to purge anyone you cannot trust to preserve the status quo, above all else.

    This also means small unit leadership and tactics are antithetical to the purpose of their military.

    To be clear, I’m not talking about Arab militant groups or militias, and this is definitely not a function of race. It’s function of the types of political systems you currently find in much of, but certainly not all, of the Arab world.