If Trump wins the election, US cities are at risk of military takeovers and mass deportations - eviltoast

Senior Democrats in US cities are preparing to defend their communities in the event ofĀ Donald Trumpā€™sĀ return to the White House after the former president has repeated threats that he would use presidential powers to seize control of major urban centers.

Trump has proposed deploying the military inside major cities largely run byĀ DemocratsĀ to deal with protesters or to crush criminal gangs. He has threatened to dispatch large numbers of federal immigration agents to carry out mass deportations of undocumented people in so-called ā€œsanctuaryā€ cities.

He also aims to obliterate the progressive criminal justice policies of left-leaning prosecutors.

ā€œIn cities where there has been a complete breakdown of law and order ā€¦ I will not hesitate to send in federal assets including the national guard until safety is restored,ā€ Trump says in the campaign platform for his bid to become the 47th US president,Ā Agenda47.

TrumpĀ provoked uproarĀ earlier this week when he called for US armed forces to be deployed against his political rivals ā€“ ā€œthe enemy withinā€ ā€“ on election day next month. But his plans to use national guard troops and military personnel as a means to attack those he sees as his opponents go much wider than that, spanning entire cities with Democratic leadership.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    22 hours ago

    No, my rebuttal was that you posted a bunch of bullshit opinions pieces, 30 year old theater bills and a fucking Amazon link as ā€œevidenceā€ that the Democratic partyā€™s platform wants to repeal the second amendment.

    Your whole argument that I think those people donā€™t count as Democrats (a no-true-scotsman) you invented in your 2nd comment to me. In case you fucking forgot, here it is.

    So those %39 arenā€™t really Democrats? Got itā€¦

    This is literally you, building your own argument and attacking it instead of countering the argument that I put forward. Literally that is the definition of a strawman.

    From Wikipedia :

    A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.

    Enough of this though, here is the DNCā€™s platform for 2024

    https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/

    Feel free to look through it, and see what Democrats actually want to do, instead of believing bullshit republican propaganda about the Democrat platform.

    Learn some shit, and then get lost. Youā€™re done here.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      4 hours ago

      instead of believing bullshit republican propaganda about the Democrat platform.

      Lol yeaā€¦all my links and the poll was republican propaganda.

      Learn some shit, and then get lost. Youā€™re done here.

      Lol ok kid

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        1 hour ago

        Your links are fucking laughable. No amount of Amazon shit, and opinions pieces are indicators of the platform for a political party. The most substantial thing was the 2 links to the same failed performance bill from 1994ā€¦ Which was never intended to pass, it was intended to signal the alternative if we couldnā€™t get an assault weapons ban.

        Youā€™d fucking know that if you were alive in the early 90ā€™sā€¦like this ā€œkidā€ was. You fucking lost, get over it.