Trump floats sending military after US citizens on election day - eviltoast
‘I think the bigger problem are the people from within, we have some very bad people, sick people, radical left lunatics,’ Republican candidate tells Fox’s Maria Bartiromo

‘I think the bigger problem are the people from within, we have some very bad people, sick people, radical left lunatics,’ Republican candidate tells Fox’s Maria Bartiromo

…

“And it should be easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military,” he said.

“I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within. Not even the people who have come in, who are destroying our country.”

It isn’t clear under what circumstances Trump would view it justifiable to call in US troops against his own countrymen.

But his comments mark a baseless attack and a particularly hollow one coming from someone whose supporters violently attacked the US Capitol in an attempt to stop him from being thrown out of office three years ago.

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      1 month ago

      The system in question:

      https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0065

      There was one difficulty however of a serious nature attending an immediate choice by the people. The right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of the Negroes. The substitution of electors obviated this difficulty and seemed on the whole to be liable to fewest objections.

      The south has a massive advantage in the electoral college because they demanded to be able to launder slave votes.

      • tmyakal@lemm.ee
        6·
        1 month ago

        The bigger problem is that the number of seats in the House has been frozen for about a hundred years. Our population exploded, but our number of representatives stayed static, so places with the most people actually get less representation in congress.

        On top of this, the number of electors a state has its equal to the number of representatives that state has in the Senate and the House combined. So more populated states also get underrepresented in the presidential election.

        The Three-Fifths Compromise was absolutely fucked, but it’s not what is deadlocking the House now and its not what is letting a people lose the popular vote and still go on to be president in 21st century elections.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 month ago

          If we took away the at large electoral seats, and the senate, that would get us halfway to fixing the representation problem.

          The house would be next, but that’s a more moderate problem compared to the other half.