5th Circuit rules ISP should have terminated Internet users accused of piracy - eviltoast

Music publishing companies notched another court victory against a broadband provider that refused to terminate the accounts of Internet users accused of piracy. In a ruling on Wednesday, the conservative-leaning US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the big three record labels against Grande Communications, a subsidiary of Astound Broadband.

The appeals court ordered a new trial on damages because it said the $46.8 million award was too high, but affirmed the lower court’s finding that Grande is liable for contributory copyright infringement.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Ok, I still don’t understand how you’ve magically invented access to the Internet Protocol network, but without an Internet Service Provider. Yes, I’ve taken direct action to enable the creation of several WISP networks in the communities I care about. Can you come up with more useless strawmen or do you just want to keep feeling special?

    Edit: upon further review it seems like you think infrastructure just magically maintains itself???

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      This commoditizes wisps, they aren’t only in places with LoS, or with special hardware, while still using unlicensed band.

      And megaisps have 2 barriers that preserve their market position:

      1. Capital costs

      2. Right of way access they got mostly in the 70s and 80s if not from the original bell rollout

      And weren’t you the one who particularly said ‘last mile’? That’s exactly what this is.