Steam Now Warns Consumers That They're Buying a License, Not a Game During a Purchase - eviltoast
  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    what’s old is new again! they tried to pull this shit back in the day but physical media was the only delivery method. now that everything is downloaded there’s a bunch of legal grey area they’re hiding in.

    so the next question, is this retroactive? if so, then when will I get my money back? Licensed software is cheaper than the full MSRP I paid for titles that had physical options I could have bought at a store. this is because licensed software usually has an expiration date while physical media with software can be installed anytime after purchase.

    so, Valve, one last question.

    where is it huh?!

    • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      yeah no, this is just fixing the wording to better represent the truth that has always been.

      this is because a California law recently passed requiring these kinds of purchases to inform consumers that they don’t actually own these games. valve decided it would be easier just to do this for everyone.

      this has always been true for all digital games you purchased. the fact that you didn’t realize this is why the law was needed.

      thanks California for being the only force fighting for consumers rights in the United States. i can see why conservatives give you so much shit. you do things that matter.

    • orangeboats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there’s one key thing you missed: you have never bought a copy of the game on Steam! It’s always been a license. Valve simply made the fact clear now because of legal changes.

      so the next question, is this retroactive

      So the answer for this is a solid no.