Is there any good private messenger at all? - eviltoast

I’ve been inspecting this topic quite a lot and I’m a little confused now. So, we have reasons not to use Signal, reasons not to use Matrix, there were also some claims about Session being a fraught. Briar is mostly activists related (not very suitable for daily use), XMPP lacks good clients and suffers from fragmentation of protocol standards implementation, SimpleX is too feature-incomplete (no UnifiedPush support, big battery drain on Android, very decent desktop client without any message sync). I can’t say a lot about Threema or Wire, as I’m not very familiar with them.

So, my question is — is there any good private messenger at all? What do you think is the most acceptable option?

EDIT: In addition to my post:

All messengers have their flaws, I’m well aware of that. I was interested in hearing users’ opinions regarding these shortcomings, not in finding the perfect messenger. I may have worded my thoughts incorrectly, sorry for that.

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That article in Signal is bogus. It is entirely based on speculation from how funding comes in, and also either ignores, or misunderstands how Signal fundamentally works.

    The EFF recommends Signal, and it’s one of the most secure ways to communicate.

    https://ssd.eff.org/module/how-to-use-signal

    You can make your own decisions, but if you just grab any random arguments, you’ll find a reason to doubt everything.

    • FeelzGoodMan420
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Lemmy has some sort of slander campaign going against Signal. Can’t tell if it’s just misinformed idiots or a paid shill smear campaign being run here (likely the former, Lemmy is too small for companies to give a shit about.) It’s really annoying. Same with Mozilla and Firefox. Not sure Lemmy likes anything?

        • Cenotaph@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Signal has usernames (must be enabled) and you can have your phone number hidden from public view & prevent it from being used to search up your acc

          • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That got added recently, but you still need a phone number to sign up. A phone number is tied to your identity, meaning that signal’s database has the names and addresses of everyone who uses it. And since signal is US-based, its subject to US national security letters, meaning its illegal for signal to tell anyone that the US government has requested information about who they’re talking to.

            Under the Obama administration, an average of 60 NSLs were issued every single day.

          • FeelzGoodMan420
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The comment you replied to basically proves my point. No one here has any fucking clue what they’re talking about.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The US-state-department funding is important sure, but you also ignored every other point in that article.

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You can make your own decisions, but if you just grab any random arguments, you’ll find a reason to doubt everything.

      Agreed. Especially if your source is Dessalines. 🙄