Only one in ten will get this - eviltoast
  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well, at least you don’t have a Primus in every family that way!

    Or, in other words, TIL Romans were bad at counting.

    lmao, there are other examples of Roman weirdness with numbers. For most of the Republic period, the year was expressed not by a number, but by which two consuls were elected that year. Ab Urbe Condita (AUC, ‘From the founding of the city’) was much more rare. “Draw 25 or use numbers like normal human beings.”

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know about the way Romans counted time. Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus? Later, the pope who established the AD counting had lots of struggle summing up all the years of the emperors without counting some years twice.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep! In the Empire, there were often numerous consuls in a year instead of just two (being rotated out as a kind of ‘gift’ from the Emperor) so the norm for counting the year changed to how many years since the ruling Emperor came into power.

        Funny how some things we take for granted, like an unborked date system, are actually innovations, and far from timeless (ha).

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          TY, I didn’t know, there were still consules in the Roman Empire.
          Yes, a continuous calendar system makes things a lot easier.

      • wanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus?

        No, it isn’t. Descriptions of when he was born are vague and contradictory.