With membership at new lows and no electoral wins to their name, it’s time for the Greens to ditch the malignant narcissist who’s presided over its decline.
And in “tell Us Something we Didn’t Already Know” news.
Riiiiiight. You do know your comment history is public, right? Because aside from the metric fuckton of misinformation that is removed when you post, you CLEARLY have an anti-democrat and pro socialist agenda to push on an election that you have nothing to do with.
Go sit down. When Denmark becomes relevant to our election, we’ll call you.
You do know your comment history is public, right?
Yep and I stand by it.
Because aside from the metric fuckton of misinformation that is removed when you post
What’s that even supposed to mean? Could you try reformatting it into a syntax readable by humans?
you CLEARLY have an agenda to push on an election that you have nothing to do with.
Nope. Just correcting objectively inaccurate statements where applicable and expressing my opinion in other cases. What agenda are you imagining me to be pursuing?
Go sit down
You first. Must be exhausting to be so pompous with so little understanding to lean on, so you must need a rest more than I do.
When Denmark becomes relevant to our election, we’ll call you.
If you’re the one doing the honors, I won’t pick up.
If you think that your opinion of our election should be relevant to us- then you must advocate for the fact that my opinion of your opinion is also relevant.
Or you can stop posting about it.
And nice little meme there bud, but 2007 called and even they think that shit is cringy.
Do you know what an ad hominem fallacy is? I bet you think you do, but since you keep committing them, I’m going to remind you:
An ad hominem fallacy is when you completely ignore the argument in favor of illogically focusing on the person making the argument or an irrelevant aspect of that person. It’s frowned upon by people who like to argue logically and it’s uncivil to boot.
Now back to our regularly scheduled programming!
If you think that your opinion of our election should be relevant to us- then you must advocate for the fact that my opinion of your opinion is also relevant.
Nope. Whether I’m from Denmark, Denver, or Djibouti has no bearing on the soundness of my arguments.
Your irrelevant feelings about the fact that I can read and form opinions about conditions without showing up in person doesn’t even qualify as an opinion.
It’s just a knee jerk xenophobic reaction or an excuse to keep yammering at me without saying anything.
Or you can stop posting about it.
Nope. You’re not the boss of me. You don’t decide what I can or cannot do.
2007 called and even they think that shit is cringy.
Late 90s called, they want their “x called, they want their y back” format back. Careful you don’t drown in your own hypocrisy.
I thought I dismissed you. Your opinion is irrelevant to me. If the topic comes to the 2025 election in Denmark, you’re welcome to summarily dismiss me when I start telling people who they should support- or if I spread misinformation about it.
Yeah, your mod logs show how much misinformation and propaganda you spread here.
Still laboring under delusions of grandeur, I see. You’re still not the boss of me.
Your opinion is irrelevant to me
Which only makes it all the more weird that you keep reiterating it like a mantra 😄
If the topic comes to the 2025 election in Denmark, you’re welcome to summarily dismiss me when I start telling people who they should support
Again, never told anyone who to support. Speaking of, what’s that agenda I “clearly” have? If it’s so clear, it should be easy for you to say what you think I’m trying to achieve.
Yeah, your mod logs show how much misinformation and propaganda you spread here.
Which is none. I’m aware that twice a biased mod has called a comment of mine misinformation in their mod log note, but in both cases the mod was upset about me saying something objectively true that they didn’t like.
Such as the fact that insisting on knowingly supplying weapons with which to commit genocide in spite of the people you’re supposed to represent urging you to stop makes you an accomplice to genocide.
So what misinformation do you think I’ve been spreading? Tell me one objectively false thing from my mod log or my other post and comment history. Go ahead.
Right… lol. How did I not predict that you would respond accusing mid bias.
Look, I get that cognitive dissonance is a bitch for a lot of people, but trust me when I say this. The dinner you lead to co trol it, the better everyone will be.
I’m ending this now. I’ve given you enough rope and you performed as well as predicted.
Riiiiiight. You do know your comment history is public, right? Because aside from the metric fuckton of misinformation that is removed when you post, you CLEARLY have an anti-democrat and pro socialist agenda to push on an election that you have nothing to do with.
Go sit down. When Denmark becomes relevant to our election, we’ll call you.
Yep and I stand by it.
What’s that even supposed to mean? Could you try reformatting it into a syntax readable by humans?
Nope. Just correcting objectively inaccurate statements where applicable and expressing my opinion in other cases. What agenda are you imagining me to be pursuing?
You first. Must be exhausting to be so pompous with so little understanding to lean on, so you must need a rest more than I do.
If you’re the one doing the honors, I won’t pick up.
Don’t care bud. It’s our election. Your opinion is irrelevant to me. Didn’t read any of that.
But you still cared enough to feel that you had to tell me?
If you think that your opinion of our election should be relevant to us- then you must advocate for the fact that my opinion of your opinion is also relevant.
Or you can stop posting about it.
And nice little meme there bud, but 2007 called and even they think that shit is cringy.
Do you know what an ad hominem fallacy is? I bet you think you do, but since you keep committing them, I’m going to remind you:
An ad hominem fallacy is when you completely ignore the argument in favor of illogically focusing on the person making the argument or an irrelevant aspect of that person. It’s frowned upon by people who like to argue logically and it’s uncivil to boot.
Now back to our regularly scheduled programming!
Nope. Whether I’m from Denmark, Denver, or Djibouti has no bearing on the soundness of my arguments.
Your irrelevant feelings about the fact that I can read and form opinions about conditions without showing up in person doesn’t even qualify as an opinion.
It’s just a knee jerk xenophobic reaction or an excuse to keep yammering at me without saying anything.
Nope. You’re not the boss of me. You don’t decide what I can or cannot do.
Late 90s called, they want their “x called, they want their y back” format back. Careful you don’t drown in your own hypocrisy.
I thought I dismissed you. Your opinion is irrelevant to me. If the topic comes to the 2025 election in Denmark, you’re welcome to summarily dismiss me when I start telling people who they should support- or if I spread misinformation about it.
Yeah, your mod logs show how much misinformation and propaganda you spread here.
Still laboring under delusions of grandeur, I see. You’re still not the boss of me.
Which only makes it all the more weird that you keep reiterating it like a mantra 😄
Again, never told anyone who to support. Speaking of, what’s that agenda I “clearly” have? If it’s so clear, it should be easy for you to say what you think I’m trying to achieve.
Which is none. I’m aware that twice a biased mod has called a comment of mine misinformation in their mod log note, but in both cases the mod was upset about me saying something objectively true that they didn’t like.
Such as the fact that insisting on knowingly supplying weapons with which to commit genocide in spite of the people you’re supposed to represent urging you to stop makes you an accomplice to genocide.
So what misinformation do you think I’ve been spreading? Tell me one objectively false thing from my mod log or my other post and comment history. Go ahead.
Right… lol. How did I not predict that you would respond accusing mid bias.
Look, I get that cognitive dissonance is a bitch for a lot of people, but trust me when I say this. The dinner you lead to co trol it, the better everyone will be.
I’m ending this now. I’ve given you enough rope and you performed as well as predicted.