‘Useful Idiot for Russia’: DNC Decides to Go Off on Jill Stein - eviltoast

“Jill Stein is a useful idiot for Russia. After parroting Kremlin talking points and being propped up by bad actors in 2016 she’s at it again,” DNC spokesman Matt Corridoni said in a statement to The Bulwark. “Jill Stein won’t become president, but her spoiler candidacy—that both the GOP and Putin have previously shown interest in—can help decide who wins. A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump.”

  • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope. Stein voters are lost voters. The Harris campaign will ignore them and move on. There is no message being broadcast or received during this election. Voting for a party that can only help install the worse of two evils is 100% a move of immense privilege, not a moral high ground.

    They have the power to put a dictator in place by leveraging people who don’t understand the primaries are for your ideals and the main election is for strategy. Until we get ranked-choice voting (and we won’t) your moral posturing does the opposite of what you think. In reality anyway.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      They have the power to put a dictator in place

      That’s power, bud, but it’s misplaced. It’s Harris that has the power to respond to those voters, or to ignore them. As you mentioned, the cost of ignoring them could put a dictator in place.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Giving voters what they want and winning them over is “stroking their egos” now? That’s such a cynical way to look at your fellow voting Americans. They are not your enemy.

          Come on man… they got us pumping anti-democratic sentiment like it’s the divine right of kings… no fucking wonder the democrats don’t ever feel the need to run on actually popular policies and at least keep things centered. We’re more than happy to deep throat the boot either way.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Candidates get themselves elected by pledging to address voters’ concerns - if anyone has an ego here it’s Harris and liberals like yourself who think they are owed votes they haven’t made any effort to get.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Stein voters are lost voters.

      Then how is she stealing votes?

      They have the power to put a dictator in place by leveraging people who don’t understand the primaries are for your ideals

      Tell that to Cori Bush and Jamal Bowman. AIPAC money bombed them out of their seats by way of primary.

      Who are their voters supposed to endorse in the general, now that they’ve been replaced by genocidal apartheidists?

      • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        If Stein was not in the running, some of her voters may have settled for Harris. As it is, she’s muddying the water. It’s not Harris’s fault a bunch of people are going to ignore the money trail and vote Stein. Harris is going to focus on the people who might be swayed.

        As for Bush and Bowman, no argument. That was rotten & PACs need to die. Those two were doing something right for AIPAC to go after them.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If they’re “lost voters” as you say, then how is she muddying the water? You said it yourself that they weren’t going to be convinced to vote harris anyways.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          If Stein was not in the running, some of her voters may have settled for Harris.

          If Stein is forced off the ballot by partisan officials and heckled in the media as an antisemite, you’re going to scare away far more Harris-curious progressives than you attract hard-Green Jill fans.

          As for Bush and Bowman, no argument. That was rotten & PACs need to die. Those two were doing something right for AIPAC to go after them.

          All true, but now who do their base voters turn out for in the General? They same AIPAC swine that ousted them? Just because they have Ds after their names?

          Or do they protest vote third party, to prove they still exist and don’t approve of either mainstream candidate?