[2023] Mozilla and Gary Vee fund cryptocurrency company Webacy - eviltoast

Gary Vee is a notorious grifter NFT salesman with a checkered past.

Webacy is a cryptocurrency wallet “technology layer” that “provides security features” like password backup, “digital wills”, etc.

  • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You all not only don’t read the article, the date published is right there in the URL

    • FeelzGoodMan420
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If you haven’t noticed, all of the Firefox Lemmy communities and Subreddits are just full of ragebait bullshit shitting on Mozilla. They have some points and Mozilla is managed like dogshig, but I still do not support ragebait for the sake of ragebait.

      • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        None of that addresses or explains why you posted an older article without noting the age of it.

        And you do know how Mozilla Ventures is different from other parts of Mozilla, right?

        • LWD@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Title changed. Can you explain your offense at not having [2023] in the title? Other people actually had a reason to complain, but you did not.

          • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Because when sharing anything, it’s important to provide the context of when it was published if it’s older? Especially when there are active and current discussions about a topic (ie governance of Mozilla) and someone could easily be confused about how recent an article is? Otherwise it could appear to be intentionally misleading, which I’m sure was not your intent.