Claudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballot - eviltoast
    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you’re claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you’ve seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not me making a claim. You have no idea what you’re talking about 😂

        This is a court case that has been out there and decided. The ruling is in. Proof was presented at a fucking trial, where evidence is submitted and reviewed. This isn’t MY opinion, it is the opinion of the Nevada Supreme Court.

        • blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Are you allowed to be out of your holding cell?

            It went through FOUR courts, and all of them said the same thing. Your position again is that EVERYONE else fucked up here?

            You asked for forms, they are right there. You asked for proof, it’s right there. What in the fuck is your damage that you can’t deal with reality?

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well they are, because the ruling references. So does the article. Then the linked articles. Do you’re just incapable of reading and following links?

                  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    If you seriously can’t read the screenshot you were sent, and can’t follow the insane number of links from the article you were sent, you might be unfit for society.

                    I’m sorry you’re so incapable.