Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then. - eviltoast
  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is why, when it comes to old music, I always try to listen to it the way it was originally intended.

    Pet Sounds, as beautiful as it is, was originally released in mono. It was mastered to be listened to in mono, at a time when stereo was mostly just a novelty.

    It wasn’t until much more recently that they’ve taken those masters and created “real” stereo mixes from them. While they can often sound pretty good, they never quite reach the level of the best sounding mono mixes of the same material.

    Just my opinion of course.

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That may be a thing with some releases, but I’m convinced that the original pet sounds and even the MFSL mono release are very inferior to that one HDCD stereo release. Still I’m listening to in 16bit/44kHz form, but to me it sounds way higher fidelity and likely is closer to the source. I can pick out instruments and sounds that I didn’t hear in the other version.

      In general though I find modern ‘remasters’ are horrible and compressed and I think it’s lame that services like Spotify usually have only the most recent (and therefore worst) version of a given album.

      May the source be with you