Navy commander relieved of duty after photo showed him firing rifle with scope backward - eviltoast
  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You never touched your optics? What service were you in? I constantly adjusted my ACOG and red dot while i was in the army in iraq.

    He would know the instant he looked in the scope and everything was tiny.

    • Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      US Army Aviation and two deployments with the AF. I was never even issued an optic as we only had a handful per company. Can’t touch what Uncle Sugar doesn’t allocate. The only time I touched a weapon that wasn’t a helicopter was during annual qualifications.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah, that makes sense then. Combat arms you pretty much have to know as much about your optics as you do your rifle. Can’t wait for an armorer when you’re out in the willywacks and your shit is broken.

        • Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yep, and I agree an 11b or equivalent who doesn’t know his ass from the front of the sight isn’t fit for duty, but this guy is a naval officer and was probably just stoked to look cooler than normal, and someone could have just as easily been playing a joke on him to see if he would notice. We play pranks on people all the time asking for PRC-E7, or grid squares, or blinker fluid.

          I doubt it’s true it’s the reason he was relieved of command, but to even think it was a last straw is crazy because if he was really that bad of a leader they wouldn’t need to use something as trivial like just a funny picture to some among the gun owner’s who know what they are even looking at.