She’s been “helping” Trump with debate prep for a couple weeks apparently. This surprises nobody.
She definitely doesn’t seem to dislike them.
Wasn’t she the one that took a few trips to Russia and was repeating Russian talking points at every opportunity? I thought she was an obvious plant.
You mean the obvious Republican who once halfheartedly claimed to be a Democrat is now supporting the Republican party’s geriatric authoritarian? I’m shocked! Shocked, I say!
She was a cult member. The cult helped get her elected in heavily Democratic Hawaii (outside of the billionaires stealing water and land to build luxury bunkers of course) She was never “REALLY” a Democrat. She managed to get some influence inside the party for a short time. But her past was always bobbing just below the surface. Making it hard to keep up the charade. She exited the party at her peak. Because she knew what was coming. And also because Republicans really like cults. As long as she’s sychopantic she can get more access and influence than she ever could as a Democrat. Specifically because she pretended to be one once.
The go-to site for “socialists”, Fox News.
I’m not clear on what you are implying or what that has to do with this news article. Is there something about socialists in the article?
I’m saying you seem to happily source a lot of fully institutionally rightwing media for a socialist. In the past hour:
- Daily Caller
- Washington Examiner
- Fox News
Ok, I read news from a variety of news orgs.
I also read socialist-centric websites and post articles from it.
And I read science-centric news sites and post articles from there.
If you are so interested my post history, why don’t you tell us all what is the majority types of the articles i have posted today: That would be science, tech, and socialist.. Here let me help you with that since you seem to have left a lot of stuff out about my posting history: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=2&sort=New&view=Posts
So should I only be reading from YOUR approved news sources?
And I’m still not clear on what that has to do with this article. Does it matter what and where I read things in my spare time? Is that some sort of qualifier for posting in this community?
If you feel that the article I posted is against the rules for posting in this community, please contact the mods. They are good at removing articles that don’t fit within the guidelines.
Interesting you linked to your second page of posts, because your first page looks like NINE posts to c/conservative.
Because you already mentioned what I had posted in last hour. And I posted a link to times before that. Feel free to go to page 3 and page 4 for what i have been up to for most of the day.
Huh, a “green supporter” that posts a lot from Fox News but never something like Grist. How … novel.
Don’t just post a link in a thread, post the article to the community. That’s what this community is for.
It’s all good. Someone else had already posted the same story.
Fox News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Fox News:
MBFC: Questionable - Credibility: Low - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-democrat-tulsi-gabbard-endorses-trump-2024-presidential-race
