Trump won't rule out family separations during his promised mass deportation of migrants - eviltoast

The former president also told NBC News that spending billions to execute mass deportations of undocumented immigrants is justified because allowing them to remain would cost more.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      You clearly support deportation of immigrants. Please correct me if my assumption based on your repeated, explicit statements is incorrect.

      So if you think immigrant workers are evil and should be prevented, that makes the white people who exploit and profiteer from their labor an entire order of magnitude more evil, right? Therefore we should cut the problem off at the source?

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I didn’t express any opinion about whether or not the deportation of illegal immigrants is a good idea. Can you quote my statements that make you think I did?

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          any immigrants denied or deported now can easily be replaced by other immigrants later.

          This shows a total callous disregard for the real human beings involved with this statement. Throwing away the “other” and ripping apart their life, family, and community is what you are supporting, intentionally or not, with your statement.

          • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You are mixing up two separate questions.

            1. Will deporting these people do irreparable damage to the USA?

            2. Will deporting these people be morally wrong?

            The answers to these two questions are independent of each other. The first question is about objective reality (if “irreparable damage” is clearly defined) and the second is about moral beliefs which are ultimately a matter of personal opinion. I’m only talking about the first question but you can still oppose deportation on moral grounds even if it turns out that mass deportations wouldn’t decrease American prosperity.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              One type of irreparable damage that could occur to the USA as a result of mass deportations could be reputational or our morality therefore these two questions are not independent of each other.

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              In that case, you’ve still left room in the discussion to address my original question that you haven’t answered: aren’t the white people profiteering off of exploited immigrant labor the real perpetrators that deserve punishment? You can answer that without stating an opinion on the morality of deportation.

              • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I can talk about my views on that issue if you’d like to hear them, although I still insist that they have no bearing on the truth or falsehood of my original claim in this thread.

                With that said, I don’t see the issue in terms of perpetrators and punishment. Many, many people in the world are much poorer than even a poor American is, and so their desire to come to the USA by whatever means is available to them is quite reasonable. Employers want to hire labor at the cheapest possible price, which is also reasonable. Finally, the general public wants cheap stuff but does not want either competition for jobs or taxes spent on supporting immigrants. That’s all reasonable too.

                I think a well-designed guest-worker program combined with increased measures against illegal immigration would maintain the rule of law, protect national security, and satisfy American employers and the American public while still providing economic opportunities for some foreigners who want them. This sort of approach works in other countries and it used to have some bipartisan support but I don’t see it going anywhere in today’s political climate.