If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"? - eviltoast

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

    • isaaclw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Icinga2 uses it

      Databses used to and switched to primary secondary

      Code releses use master, develop…

      Its all over software still but transitioning

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        the master branch in git refers to mastering, the same as the term “remastered”, rather than slavery. I prefer main anyways.

        • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean none of these things need to mean slavery unless you’re so steeped in guilt and shame and anger that everything does

          Seriously like I literally never once thought about slavery whenever typing “master” until these fucking people brought it up. Like maybe we can abolish the stock market or something, changing master to main is just masturbating

          • maniii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            A master-drivetrain and a slaved-drivetrain … its not about slavery. I dont understand why people have to be so sensitive. We know human slavery is bad. So we dont do it. Same for a lot of instances of Animal slavery which is acceptable for a lot of people, we dont call it that, it is called “farming” or “husbandry”.

            btw Im just kidding, I wanna trigger a vegan into a response :-D

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s really a trivial change and if there’s any possibility it contributes to a hostile industry, why not? I’m not going to tell other how they feel, nor is there any real downside.

            If it helps get me a more diverse candidate pool I can hire from, even better

          • isaaclw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            We can do both. I see what you mean in so far as “washing” like pretending that we fixed something when we really didnt, but I dont see it as a big deal, I mean, like I said elsewhere, I’ll try to switch.

            Its sometimes little things in your vocab that cause you to stop and realize how ingrained certain aspects of our culture is.

            But yeah, its not a solution. Theres a lot of things like it that you just do because its easy and you can.

    • dufkm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah, industrial communication protocols in the IT industry uses lots of master/slave terminology. E.g. Modbus and Profibus DP comes to mind.