Elon Musk draws fire for playing down impact of America’s atomic bombing of Japan: ‘Not as scary as people think’ - eviltoast

Elon and Trump make the worst possible argument for nuclear power I have ever heard:

“Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed but now they are full cities again,” the multibillionaire owner of Tesla, SpaceX and X said.

“That’s great, that’s great,” Mr Trump responded.

“It is not as scary as people think, basically,” Mr Musk added.

They joked about nuclear power facing a “branding problem”.

“We will have to rebrand it,” the former president told Mr Musk. “We will name it after you or something.”

  • Cynicus Rex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not defending these two unethical bullies in general, but on this particular paragraph they are totally taken out of context. It is obvious that they are not downplaying the atrocities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki but merely stating that nuclear energy is not bad since people are already living there again.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Then they are simply idiots. A nuclear bomb like Hiroshima and Nagasaki are much different than the meltdown in Pripyat. That still has dangerous levels of radiation.

      • Cynicus Rex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Fair point. I should’ve made the distinction. But in any case, nuclear power plants aren’t bad.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          As I said in my original post, the problem is that it is the worst possible argument you can make in favor of nuclear power, not that there are arguments in favor of nuclear power.

          • Cynicus Rex@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m just addressing the fuss that’s being created. They are clearly not saying “the bombings were not as bad as people think”, but the headlines and articles make it seem so.

            By doing this we are using the same spurious tactics as they are. Inundating people with blown out of proportion news like this will desensitise them to step into action when it will actually be warranted—the boy who cried wolf.

            They spew tons of misinformation/disinformation/fallacies that should be addressed instead.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, he’s saying nuclear power isn’t as scary as people think because things got better in the cities that America dropped atomic bombs on.

              Which is exactly what I quoted him saying.

              • Cynicus Rex@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I can’t disagree with what you quoted, nor state that it is a good argument—it isn’t, as was already pointed out and which I do agree with. I’m emphasising that they are not saying “the bombings were not as bad as people think”.