The NYPD has stopped tens of thousands of people under Mayor Adams. Just 5% were white. - eviltoast
    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Most studies show blacks commit a majority of the crimes but not 95%

      That logic only works under the assumption everyone that commits a crime is caught…

      Which is incredibly naive.

      You should use “convicted of crimes” not “committed crimes”. And even then, that’s ignoring how our justice system uses insane prison sentences to make people take plea deals. So innocent people are coerced into pleasing guilty to avoid jail.

      • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are literally no valid, trustworthy crime statistics in the US. Police only stop people they want to stop, they more often than not lie in court to secure convictions, public defenders have obscene caseloads that leave them entirely unable to provide a competent, effective defense, and, as you said, defendants are all but forced into shit plea deals for crimes they usually either didn’t commit or shouldn’t be imprisoned for.

        The US justice system isn’t just broken, it’s nearly nonexistent and should be treated as entirely illegitimate.

    • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually commit, or arrested for, or convicted for? I’m on mobile and can’t dive the PDF, but “commit” sounds like it’s a denominator, not a numerator.

        • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure that attacking the idea of the plea itself is right. Plea deals are useful in a well-run juridical model.

          Instead, prosecutors should be barred from overcharging as a form of coercion, which is plainly what they often do today. Some combo of state legislators, the state supreme courts, and the ABA should create guardrails for charging decisions.

          Finally, as I understand its history, the broad use of overcharging is a fairly recent development that arose because other parts of our system broke down or were overwhelmed, often because of underfunding and/or political expedience.

        • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s still better than anyone else but it’s bad.

          Not even close. The vast majority of wealthy nations have far better justice systems than the US.

            • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Our strength is you have to proved guilty.

              This just simply isn’t true at all. A prosecutor just has to coerce and intimidate you into a plea deal or use unreliable and generally false police testimony to convince a group of average dipshits off the street.