DNC virtual roll call vote ends with Kamala Harris receiving 99% of delegate votes. Here are the full results. - eviltoast

The Democratic National Committee’s virtual roll call vote has closed, and the Democratic Party announced that Vice President Kamala Harris received the votes of 99% of the participating delegates.

In a statement late Monday, Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison and Minyon Moore, the Democratic National Convention committee chair, said that the roll call results would next be certified by the convention’s secretary, Jason Rae, formalizing Harris’ status as the Democratic nominee who will take on Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

  • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Democracy happens at the general election. Primaries are held by the parties and they decide their own rules. Are you saying US was not a democracy before the 70s when delegates picked candidates without regards to the primaries?

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      There was a Democratic primary. Biden won this year’s primary and Kamala did not have a challenger.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Delegates are pledged during the primary, but are not voted until the convention.

        Seeing as the delegates pledged for the Biden/Harris campaign, its pretty reasonable to think they were already happy with Harris as a potential president. The 99% pledge she just got from the same delegates makes it deafeningly clear that is still the case.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, we literally had to riot to get competitive primaries…

      We shouldn’t just give them away.

      Nothing to do this year, but 2028 needs a competitive primary even if it’s Harris again

      • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t understand why this is downvoted. It is important to have meaningful primaries. The Biden dropout kerfuffle is a direct result of skipping this for incumbents. On top of that, primaries are a great way for new voices to gain some name recognition.

        If you look back at who people were talking about replacing Biden with, you can see that the majority were drawn from the 2020 primary. It’s vital to keep that process moving so we don’t have years where we have to replace a candidate in a panic at the last moment, and in the event that the unforeseeable happens, it is just as vital to have runners up to replace the candidate with. Having competitive primaries every election is something we should absolutely make a priority.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s literally no bigger platform to talk to Americans than presidential elections, and that includes primary.

          Wasting it just makes zero sense. It’s hours and hours of free prime time TV and media coverage, for basically anything you want to talk about.

          You could literally ignore every question these days and just do stump speeches.