Intel's stock drops 30% overnight —company sheds $39 billion in market cap | As of now, Intel's market value is a fraction of Nvidia's worth and less than half of AMD's - eviltoast

Intel’s stock dropped around 30% overnight, shaving some $39 billion from the company’s market capitalization since rumors of a pending layoff first emerged. The devastating results come after the chip giant reported a loss for the second quarter, complained about yield issues with the Meteor Lake CPU, provided a modest business outlook for the next few quarters, and announced plans to lay off 15,000 people worldwide.

When the NYSE closed on July 31, Intel’s market capitalization was $130.86 billion. Then, a report about Intel’s massive layoffs was published, and the company’s market capitalization dropped sharply to $123.96 billion on August 1. Following Intel’s financial report yesterday, the company’s capitalization dropped to $91.86 billion. Essentially, Intel has lost half of its capitalization since January. As of now, Intel’s market value is a fraction of Nvidia’s worth and less than half of AMD’s.

As Intel’s actions look rather desperate, analysts believe that Intel’s challenges are existential. “Intel’s issues are now approaching the existential,” Stacy Rasgon, an analyst with Bernstein, told Reuters.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    263
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It certainly doesn’t help Intel has been intentionally selling defective product in the 13th and 14th gen lines. People are quite reasonably going to AMD more and more.

    • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Does AMD have anything to compete with Intel QSV? I’m looking to upgrade my Plex server and was looking at a newer Intel CPU.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The latest AMD cpus do have transcoding, but Amd transcode isn’t very good and isn’t very compatible with Linux.

        You can pick up an Intel A310 single slot GPU for $100 and it has AV1 encode, which is something that the igpu QSV doesn’t have. Works very well in my Epyc motherboard with 76 pcie lanes. I definitely recommend going with an ATX 1st gen Epyc cpu+motherboard if you want something that can do NVMe raid.

        • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          3 months ago

          Amd transcode isn’t very good and isn’t very compatible with Linux

          It’s compatible just fine. But the quality… well, it’s not the worst, but definitely not the best quality.

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Politely, not the worst compared to what, exactly?

            It’s way worse than qsv, nvenc, x264 or x265 which are basically the only hardware or cpu options you’re likely to run into doing plex transcoding.

            • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t have QSV or NVENC hardware to compare, but AMD is perfectly fine in most cases.
              I mostly noticed quality drop with very busy scenes and some scene transitions.
              Outside of those the quality was acceptable.

              I’d say on my setup it’s comparable to software encoding with x264 veryfast preset.

              And my GPU is 5 years old now, so I’m sure newer cards have improved.

              • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Lower quality at any given bitrate was my experience too. For local stuff it didn’t really matter: if I could do 3x the bitrate to get the same quality, then meh, who cares.

                If you’re streaming/doing shit over the internet/encoding for something like Youtube, though, it’s uh, not a good tradeoff because you can’t necessarily even make that tradeoff.

            • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think AMF is still faster/better quality than CPU transcoding, depending on the preset.

        • JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can pick up an Intel A310 single slot GPU for $100 and it has AV1 encode, which is something that the igpu QSV doesn’t have.

          That’s still an Intel product though…

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It’s the best option on the market right now and the most compatible one. The drivers are owned by the Linux Foundation, and there are no known hardware bugs with Intel GPUs, unlike with Intel CPUs. You have so much flexibility; Buying an Intel GPU doesn’t prevent you from using another CPU, even GPU-less AMD Epyc CPUs that have the cheapest PCIe/$. All you need is a PCIe slot and you get all the benefits of Intel with none of the drawbacks.

            I’m a bit of an AMD fanboy sometimes and I own AMD stock, but the A310 can’t be beat for Jellyfin transcoding. If you really hate Intel, keep in mind that Intel probably loses money on every GPU they sell 😉

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        AMD have anything to compete with Intel QSV

        I believe AMD VCN does the same thing. Though I haven’t looked into it. AMD chips also have pretty decent onboard video cores, so you might be able to do hardware accelerated encoding that way too.

        was looking at a newer Intel CPU

        Just stay away from Intel 13th and 14th gen chips. They have oxidation issues from the factory and are also over-volting themselves. The former is unfixable and the latter causes unfixable damage.

      • czardestructo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use the onboard CPU of my ryzen 5600g for my jellyfin and nextcloud (memories app) duties and it works flawless.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hardly ever transcode at home. I mostly use ffmpeg on a crappy old i5 server that I use for other beataround stuff too. I tend to do that in batch mode and it’s fast enough for my purposes. That’s an approach to consider. Or you could spin up Intel VM’s as needed on Hetzner unless you’re doing a totally ridiculous amount of transcoding.

        • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I need on-location transcoding because my internet is garbage (~50 mbps). Sometimes my users need to transcode the show if the bit rate of the file is too high for my internet to keep up.

          • solrize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Wait you’re literally serving other users from a home internet? Oh man, get a VM or some colo space or something. Or faster internet. Your internet is much faster than mine and one reason I transcode remotely is to drop the bit rate enough that I can download the transcoded version without waiting all day.

            • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, I can stream 4K HDR if the player supports the video format, but clients don’t always jive well with whatever Radarr decided. I know I can fine tune it but everything works well enough right now and I don’t have time to change it.

              I move around too much to do colocation. A VPS/VM isn’t worth the cost to me. My server is all old parts and I don’t pay for power usage.

      • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I find software reencoding/remux instead of doing it on the fly is easier for my brain to manage over alignment of the hardware stars.

        • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Eh… I will probably go with a used 9th or 10th gen i7 or something. Intel still gets no money and I get a good CPU.

          • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s true as well. I’m using an older 7th gen Intel for remuxing, but do software AV1 encodes which take like 11 hours lol