‘Can Artificial Intelligence Speak for Incapacitated Patients at the End of Life?’ No, and what the hell is wrong with you? - eviltoast
JAMA Internal Medicine presents an opinion article: “Can Artificial Intelligence Speak for Incapacitated Patients at the End of Life?” The authors, three doctors from UCSF, don’t seem to have heard…
  • froztbyte@awful.systemsEnglish
    18·
    5 months ago

    edit: to the absolute human shitstain that downvoted this

    ugh. don’t do that :<

    have the balls to reply why.

    this isn’t highschool, no-one owes you homework

    (a bit of advice: instead treat that as a reason to reflect as to why. you might learn something)

      • flere-imsaho@awful.systemsEnglish
        20·
        5 months ago

        my condolences.

        and, no matter how much this has helped you to cope with your personal trauma, going through that trauma does not entitle you to use emotional blackmail to silence people who do not subscribe to the llm hype.

        • self@awful.systemsEnglish
          15·
          5 months ago

          couldn’t have said it better myself, but for posterity, they of course sent a report:

          Reason: Sanctimonious bullshit, unsolicited advice and multi instance harassment

          I initially had some sympathy for their position, but the downvote whining and report abuse really has done them no favors. it’s time for them to find a different instance to pollute.

          • froztbyte@awful.systemsEnglish
            8·
            5 months ago

            I specifically did not touch on that aspect because, like, yay accidental benefit? but extreme emphasis on the “accidental”, and it’s not debate club and and and… but then they had to go throw a tantrum