Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden - eviltoast

Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country.

I’m a doctor.So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered.

Republicans have stated budget cuts need to be made with an ever-growing debt. But where was this attitude when tax cuts for the wealthy were on the table in 2017? They don’t have to look at patients in the eye and break the devastating news that they have cancer. They don’t have to treat cancers that block intestines or drown a patient’s lungs in fluid.

  • sparkle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Cymraeg
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The stuff passed during Nixon’s presidency was mostly not bad, because he had a progressive congress and knew it was good for his public image if he went along with their stuff (and took credit for their successes), but Nixon realized Southern Strategy, and his presidency perhaps marked the start of descent into incivility and absurdity in politics. He was a piece of shit in every regard imaginable, but he wasn’t an obstructionist afaik.

    Reagan is where policy took a SHARP dive, straight into the ground. He was the next step which was allowed by Nixon turning national politics into a rapid-fire shit-spewing competition.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I won’t necessarily speaking on policy, but more-so as a time-frame of when certain lines were crossed.

      With Nixon, the Nixon Goes to China moment could be argued was the point in time which ultimately lead to massive off-shoring/out-sourcing that gutted America’s manufacturing industries and set the middle-class on its downward spiral.

      Then there was his prolonging of the Vietnam War for his political benefit, at the cost of needless soldiers lives.

      Then there’s the whole Watergate fiasco, which directly led to the founding of Fox News.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Calling opening relations with China as a negative is a bad take.

        The companies that sold out the skeleton of the USA, by screwing the employees to pay shareholders and executives, are to blame for the current situation.

        Was the EPA also a negative move to you?