Venezuela: Maduro declared winner amid global skepticism - eviltoast
  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t trust their word and potentially inflated stats too much until the evidence is fully validated,

    but

    Maduro and the CNE’s ad-hoc caginess about the reports and local stats are much more revealing, given that they are the custodians of the election and should have an interest in transparency if Maduro had won.

    e.g. look at this bullshit

    This is a massive self-own, no CIA interference needed.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The most obvious answer is that all of those candidates were labeled as “other” for the purpose of reporting and collectively got 4.6%, and the chart maker didn’t want to redesign it to accommodate for not knowing individual results.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That would be fine if there were a detailed report of the results online or declared somewhere so people could check the results in each municipality. Instead, the https://www.cne.gob.ve/ is still down, I have no idea where to see where Maduro won and lost and by how much…all we have is that…which is clearly fucked.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It still doesn’t legitimize this as evidence. Focus instead on the disparity between polling and vote count. Looks like this was already widely debunked.

          • Gsus4@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            polling can fail spectacularly. This is not about “evidence”, it is blatant obstruction by the official institutions that oversee the election, which is at least as bad. That is the only thing everyone is sure of at the moment.