Biden to call for Supreme Court changes, end to presidential immunity - eviltoast
  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hell yeah do it. I wonder what he’ll be able to accomplish.

    I didn’t expect his wealth tax or green new deal to go through, and he got em passed. Shoot, and minority legal funding.

    He’ll get something through.

    Sure hope it’s presidential immunity reversal or term limits, that shits is crazy.

    • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Almost impossible, given the current composition of the HoR, but this is getting the ball rolling, legislation is already being drafted, campaigns gearing up over these issues. If the Democrat’s win both chambers of Congress and the Presidency, Harris will be the one signing these bills into law.

  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good luck with that. They’re already bought and paid for. They owe no loyalty to Biden or democrats.

  • unitymatters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    In regards to term limits of Supreme Court justices, some say that only a constitutional amendment could enforce term limits, as current proposed legislation would be unconstitutional. They argue that the relegation of judges to a new form of senior status (described in past bill proposals) runs afoul to the constitutional provision allowing justices to serve “in good Behaviour”, according to Article III Section 1. President Biden supports a system where a President would appoint a justice every 2 years and justices would serve 18 year terms on the Supreme Court.

    https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-democratic-governance/pros-and-cons-of-enacting-supreme-court-term-limits/

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think they are correct, an amendment would be the appropriate form for this change as the constitution says what ever 5 of the 9 of the justices say it does.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So correct me if I’m wrong, but this is meaningless right? This is not within the scope of what the president can do. Him calling for these changes is about as impactful as the owner of a coffee shop doing the same. Congress has no obligation to listen to him on this, let alone take steps to get it done. Just feels ridiculous that we’re cheering this.

    People: “Oh boy, Biden is free to flex his power in great ways during these last few months, can’t wait to see what he decides to do!”

    Biden: “I wish things could be better…”

    People: “YEA! Get 'em Joe!”

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      He can’t do it on his own, but if the sitting President calls for, say, a constitutional amendment, it immediately has political credibility and is far more likely to be passed. This is a very, very good thing.

        • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes. Biden managed to get a decent portion of his “Build Back Better” campaign platform passed in his 1st 2 years, when the Democrats (narrowly) held both chambers of Congress.

        • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know why you are being downvoted for your question. I too have lost faith in Congress and fail to see how this will materialize into any kind of real change. I would love to be wrong though.

    • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think the difference with your argument is that the guy at the coffee shop isn’t the leader of the free world.

      • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Leader of the western, capitalist, corpo-military complex sure…but “leader of the free world” is a bit hyperbolic no?