In his attacks on the ‘childless’ left, JD Vance once hyped a plan to give parents more votes - eviltoast
  • Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    By that argument, the lower rate of reproduction is western countries is eugenics, since it’s a consequence of policy (education).

    Actually one of the best things that poor folks can do to escape generational poverty, is to have fewer kids. That way, kids inherit a larger share of their grandparents assets, and more can be passed down. Generational land ownership, for example, is extremely powerful. Fewer children per family also lowers the financial burden of education, enabling better education for comparatively fewer people. That’s not eugenics, it’s smart family planning.

          • Bye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Any policy can disproportionately affect the birth rate of one group vs another. Is improving abortion access eugenics? Is incentivizing having children via the tax code eugenics because those incentives are stronger for some groups compared to others? Is for-profit healthcare eugenics because it makes it more difficult for poor folks to safely have children? Are fossil fuels eugenics because they lead to higher infant mortality in poorer industrial areas?

            No, none of those things are eugenics