Johnson: Replacing Biden on ticket would be 'wrong,' 'unlawful' - eviltoast

This was always the plan. They will contest any replacement and then only Trump will be on the ballot. AOC tried to warn you fucking people. This is why Biden needed to go over a year ago and the PARTY said “fuck you guys” until it was too hard to fucking ignore.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve seen way too much fuckery that the Republicans keep winning in court on to fully trust that that’s enough to save us.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh I’m sure they’ll try. But I think even SCOTUS would have a hard time justifying forcing a presidential candidate who dropped out before the convention to be on the ballot. They may still do it, but I think it will be very, very difficult. I could certainly see Roberts not going for that.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Roberts I’m iffy about, he seems torn between his legacy and his legacy…

        The real legacy of being a semi-corrupted court, and the winners-take-all-and-write-the-history legacy of being the bestest court ever who helped Donald Trump secure his win against the evil corrupt Democrats. He seems at least mildly interested in the latter, because it allows him to pretend he’s more serious than he is.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            But he did sit on the immunity decision for months after months of ignoring Jack Smith requesting the same thing. Yet somehow, when a Republican brought the same issue to the court, it was suddenly an important issue… just not important enough to rule on quickly.

            …and then they just did a major power grab by making themselves the arbiters of what official acts are and are not.

            Sorry, but the immunity decision screams Robert could give a fuck less about being in the pocket.

            • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Dude, absofuckinglutely. Robert’s was never not on Trump’s side, he just bided his time until the right decisions came through, like the one that makes the president a de-facto kingship based in court opinions with a huge amount of freshly minted psychos as judges.