Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warns anti-Biden Democrats about what comes next if they succeed - eviltoast

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has issued a dire warning to her party about the chaos that could ensue if they succeed in pushing President Joe Biden off the ticket. And she criticized Democrats whoā€™ve given off-the-record quotes that suggest the party has resigned itself to a second Trump term.

InĀ an Instagram Live video on Thursday, Ocasio-Cortez warned liberals that a brokered convention could lead to chaos, in part because she says some of the Democratic ā€œelitesā€ who want Biden outĀ alsoĀ donā€™t want Vice PresidentĀ Kamala HarrisĀ as the nominee in his place.

ā€œIf you think that is going to be an easy transition, Iā€™m here to tell you that a huge amount of the donor class and these elites who are pushing for the president not to be the nominee also do not want to see the VP be the nominee,ā€ she said.

Ocasio-Cortez claimed none of the people sheā€™s spoken with who are calling onĀ Biden to drop outĀ ā€” including lawmakers and legal experts ā€” have articulated a plan to swap out the nominee without minimizing the serious legal and procedural challenges that are likely to ensue.

Ocasio-Cortez also highlighted the racial, ethnic and class divisions that appear to have formed between the majority of thoseĀ pining to blow up the ticketĀ ā€” led mostly by white Democrats and media pundits ā€” and those elected officials who feel they and their constituents have too much at stake to upend the process at this point and so are willing to do the work to re-elect Biden-Harris. She alluded to this cultural divide in her video when she spoke out against anonymous sources expressing a sense of fatalism on behalf of Democrats about what might happen if Biden remains on the ticket:

What I will say is what upsets me is [Democrats] saying we will lose. For me, to a certain extent, I donā€™t care what name is on there. We are not losing. I donā€™t know about you, but my community does not have the option to lose. My community does not have the luxury of accepting loss in July of an election year. My people are the first ones deported. Theyā€™re the first ones put in Rikers. Theyā€™re the first ones whose families are killed by war.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    anyone who isnā€™t progressive is a republican

    Nope. Just less than adequate.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      If they vote dem, theyā€™re adequate.

      Iā€™m not super happy with ā€œadequateā€, but thatā€™s why we call it ā€œadequateā€.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Lemme clarify: There are a whole host of issues we need to keep in mind as we do our little part in the hopes of directing our own country:

      • healthcare and education as to oneā€™s requirements
      • reproductive rights are healthcare rights, as a body-autonomy issue that doesnā€™t affect others
      • safe food, safe water, safe living, safe working, safe expression, safe discussion
      • fixing and improving all infrastructure ā€“ power, water, waste, data, commute/travel
      • ensuring everyone pays their fair share of taxes, including getting homeless+jobless back on both
      • long-term care for those who canā€™t self-care or work for non-resolving reasons

      We have a list of basic minimums, and for me they look like that quick list above, but surely with a few more Iā€™m not thinking of right now.

      I will judge the character of governments, governors and people according to the completeness of their support for that list. So thereā€™s a long spectrum of increasing inadequacy between progressive people and republicans, and people who are fail the test are just somewhere on that spectrum.

      And thatā€™s okay: everyone gets their opinion. Some people arenā€™t fit to lead, though, nor to manage our consolidated and shared resources (taxes), and those people need to be retrained for a role where they CAN work effectively.