Silicon Valley elites revealed as buyers of $800m of land to build utopian city - eviltoast

After weeks of local speculation, the purchasers of 55,000 acres of northern California land have been revealed. The group Flannery Associates – backed by a cohort of Silicon Valley investors – has quietly purchased $800m worth of agricultural and empty land, the New York Times has reported. Their goal is to build a utopian new town that will offer its thousands of residents reliable public transportation and urban living, all of which would operate using clean energy.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lemmy users: We need more housing, walkable cities, public transport, and renewable energy

      Developer: Plans to build more housing in a new walkable city with public transport powered by renewable energy

      Lemmy users: Not like that!

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Where do you get the impression this is built “for the ultra-rich”? Why would they be taking public transport over their personal jets and private cars? Why would they live in an urban area with tens of thousands of other residents instead of their personal mansions on acreage? This is definitely an investment for upper-middle to upper class residents.

          As for farmland, article itself says “bad soil that only contributes 5% of the county’s agricultural production”. When you need housing, housing needs to go somewhere.

          Your government isn’t going to build the cities the climate needs, if tech investors want to with their own cash I say go for it.

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            While I don’t fully disagree with you, these towns being funded by the ultra-rich, usually by people who already have shady business practices, are looking awfully like company towns. Amazon’s already trying to build company-provided housing near a lot of their hubs, which is bad in that now your healthcare AND your shelter are directly tied to your employment. Imagine if they get their way with building a whole micro-city that runs on that idea - where every last bit of wealth an employee might spend goes STRAIGHT back to your company. Their utilities get dealt with by Amazon-built power and water plants. Their food is provided by Amazon grocery stores or deliveries. Your healthcare is provided by Amazon, and your housing is at the whim of your employer. All of this is provided at jacked-up prices, of course, so you’re effectively just a debt slave until you die or the company decides to kick you to the curb.

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s being built by an investment firm though, doesn’t look to be company housing, just looks like an investment to me.

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, why think critically and make an intelligent argument when you can just hand-wave “history” lol

                • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Whatever you say strawman, keep up with your scorched earth policy of gatekeeping who’s allowed to fight climate change.

  • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I fucking hate that they used the term “empty” land. The poll question posed to residents asked them if they would be more in favor if they knew it was “bad soil” that only contributed to 5% of CA agriculture, as though making money is all that land is good for.

    Yes, Fairfield, CA is kind of a shit hole. But NorCal open land is absolutely beautiful, like all of California. Every single fucking time I go there, which is pretty frequently, there are new mcmansion housing developments and business parks and data centers that are starting to be built or have just finished. There are protected wetlands between Sacramento and the east bay (far east) where migratory birds come back every year. Just because they don’t build on the fucking wetlands doesn’t mean this constant building isn’t going to affect what little nature is left. I’m so fucking sick of seeing my home paved over for profit and I feel so powerless to do anything. Because I am powerless.

    As if that weren’t enough, we all know this is going to be some walled-off rich-people city where they can escape from us proles, right? Sick shit.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The American Dream was get married and have a job, buy a house, have a family, and retire.

    Now it is to be so rich and wealthy that you don’t have to care about anyone else.

    • ManateeFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if you aren’t getting rich, just don’t care about anyone else. You’re half way there. /s

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now it is to be so rich and wealthy that you don’t have to care about anyone else.

      That has always been part of the dream. It’s just you can only get there if you were born on third base now.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, it’s a return to feudalism and vassalage. A fortress for themselves and their servants (billionaires don’t do their own cooking and cleaning, they are important people afterall).

      They know they need reasons for people to pledge fealty and they think public transport, apartments and clean energy is enough of a drawcard for their workers. The sad part is that they have eroded workers rights so far that they may well be right. Many other places in the world, these perks are much more normal.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think Marc Andreessen or Laurene Powell Jobs are planning on living next to Travis Air Force Base themselves.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There has to be more to this story…

    If the distinguishing features are public transportation and clean energy, they’re probably not building it to live in themselves. And while there’s a big demand for more housing in the Bay Area generally, Solono County is a bit of a commute for current workers.

    It feels like they’re building this as a company town for some yet-to-be-announced new business project that they want to be isolated from existing urban areas.

    (edit) I guess I don’t mean “urban areas” so much as areas where employees would have contact with other Silicon Valley firms and culture.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Travis AFB may nominally be part of Fairfield, but it’s outside of the urban area surrounded by agricultural fields. And the existing industries in Fairfield proper aren’t the sort that typical Silicon Valley businesses would benefit from being near.

    • ultimate_question@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, regardless of what this is there’s a 100% chance that it’s a profit scheme and has nothing to do with building anything practical for anyone

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Solano isn’t any further than any other place in the bay. Generally speaking. I work in SF and live in Vallejo. Almost all of my coworkers commute just as far.

      • D1G17AL@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s really not a decent excuse for making a 2+ hour commute. The insanity of the number of people living in places like Vallejo just to commute to San Francisco is staggering to me. Remote work for anyone that can do it should be the norm. The traffic in the Bay Area is back to being just downright awful. When most people were staying home it was actually nice to drive around to different places.

        • delaunayisation@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          US cities could be easily compressed to be third their size with people having access to green areas, walkable neighborhoods and basic convenience by the door but having 5 square meters of grass in front of their porch and F-350 parked outside is just too important for them.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s going to end up soulless and miserable, no doubt

    just a series of mansions connected by roads, completely forgetting any sort of amenities or ability to produce things locally, because rich people think “mom and pop store” is when get your parents to bring things along on their private jet.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet they’ll act like people who move next to a farm and complain about the smell.

      “Hiiii, we’re your neighbors down the road. Do you think you could not fly your little airplanes around? They’re awfully loud. Thanks bunches!”

      • geodesic@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You joke, but the towns of Portola Valley and Woodside (south of SF) are so wealthy and powerful they literally rerouted some plane routes by pulling strings of the FAA because they didn’t like the noise.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They will all serve and work for the military.

      Military based economy.

      More pro-war people, proxy wars for everyone.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a bunch of rich fucks trying to con other rich fucks and hope to leave whoever is holding their junk bonds in the lurch.

  • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is end game capitalism. They have their own cities with their own laws. You are essentially forced to live and work at the same place and buy your groceries and other essentials from your employees. You’re basically an indentured servant at that moment.

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually, this is early stage capitalism. Company towns were a thing in the late 19th and early 20th century. Government eventually stepped in, broke up the trusts and made that kind of thing a relic of a worse time.

      People have forgotten their and they’re now repeating it. We’ve been in the second Gilded age for what - 30 years now?

      Child labor was just legalized in Kansas I think and it looks like some other Republican states are trying to do the same.

      This is what happens when you let the foxes run the hen house.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly why Amazon been taking about building such towns for its workers. I swear if the conservatives get their way and the way things are going I see them trying to find a way legalize slavery again.

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Student loans, impossible mortgages, impossible rent, healthcare tied to jobs… I get that it’s not “slavery” but still… It’s a little bit slavery.