Project 2025 aims to eliminate NOAA which makes sense because all you need to track a hurricane is a sharpie - eviltoast
  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    4 months ago

    The funny thing is that NOAA and NWS are part of the Department of Commerce, the department that directly works with businesses to ensure that goods and services can plan for the weather. They track ocean currents, wind patterns, and yes temperature changes.

    The accuracy of their models have become so good that we have pretty darn good forecasting now.

    All so that Walmart can buy shovels in time for the next snow storm.

    Yet they want to do a way with the agency because climate change is now a woke issue.

    Talk about biting off your nose to spit at your opponent.

  • finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    a lot of P25 seems either to be 1) fuck minorities or 2) petty vengeance

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      As well as Christian sharia law and corporate greed. It’s horrifying and we’ll be too mired in a fascist hellhole to get to enjoy the fact that they’ll have ended the US as a world power, which will fuck them over, too.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      One thing I’ve heard but haven’t checked yet is that it’s surprisingly pro gmo

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why wouldn’t it be? A lot of under-informed liberals automatically hate them, and their potential for owner donor profits when under-regulated is enormous.

        Things like the fact that, if used right, they’re the best weapon we have against the coming climate change caused starvation doesn’t factor into GOP calculations. Because they don’t plan to even TRY feeding anyone not paying them a premium for it.

        • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          People that hate GMO usually don’t get to explain why, or don’t understand why liberals might be against them. But the truth is that people that know don’t hate the genetic altering parts so much as why those parts are altered.

          It’s the pesticide.

          That’s almost always why there’s a GMO.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          GMOs suck when farmers get sued by big corporations, because they were sowing seeds that grew on their plot. All because corporations can patent DNA sequences.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, that’s a good example of the under-regulation I was referring to. It’s patently insane that they’re allowed to do that, pun not intended but welcomed.

  • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s untrue, because he won’t need a Sharpie anymore. They will just be reporting whatever Trump wants them to report. There is no hurricane. Here’s some paper towel. This will all blow over by Easter.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Of course there’s no hurricane. Trump personally nuked it. In unrelated news, all US nukes are henceforth required to have a pussy for trump to grab them by.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      All the competent people would be fired, so it wouldn’t be accurate regardless. Everything these agencies say will just be Dear Leader propaganda.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be completely fair…they likely have zero idea what NOAA is and they certainly hate and fear the unknown.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Shout-out to when Rick Perry wanted to abolish the department of energy, not knowing it’s responsible for maintaining our nations nuclear weapons, international treaty monitoring for nukes, and nuclear waste management and cleanup.

      Texas man think government energy bad. Must abolish.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They want to hand that over to private AccuWeather. They already had the CEO in Trump’s administration.

    • Riskable@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      Jokes on them then: AccuWeather wouldn’t exist without NOAA since that’s where they get almost all their weather data.

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    The whole thing about the sharpie makes one wonder what is dumber, the suggestion itself or the base that would believe it.

    The reason why the circles are growing is to show uncertainty where the hurricane might go. The sharpie drawing shows that whomever drew it completely misunderstood what the map was showing.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      If I remember correctly the sharpie map was because Trump tweeted that Alabama was going to be affected and then after people called NOAA and they said Alabama was fine, Trump instead of admitting his mistake, repeated on Twitter that he was correct culminating in a press conference where he presented an official NOAA map that had sharpie drawn into Alabama.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Dorian–Alabama_controversy

    • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If we ban the agency that manufacturers all the hurricanes, maybe hurricanes won’t happen anymore. Hurricanes cause destruction to property and are a waste of taxpayer dollars especially when noaa scientists make 2 or 3 of them happen per year. /s

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are we able to say Simpsons predicted the Republican Party mostly just being a gaggle of the most despicable sorts of people congregating mostly out of spite for the decent morally upright society the rest of us try to participate in?