Project 2025 was supposed to boost Donald Trump's campaign — but now it may be backfiring - eviltoast

The over 900-page document, commissioned by the people expected to run another Trump White House, is a laundry list of the far-right’s most politically toxic ideas, from banning abortion nationwide to mass firing federal officials who believe in protecting public health and safety. One would think that Trump and his allies would try to keep their sinister plans out of public view. Instead, Team Trump published their fascistic blueprint on a website for anyone to read,. They even proudly display the menacing “Project 2025” label on the front page.

On Sunday, actress Taraji P. Henson took a break during the BET Awards, which she was hosting, to speak out about Project 2025. “The Project 2025 plan is not a game. Look it up!” she told viewers. “I’m talking to all the mad people that don’t want to vote. You’re going to be mad about a lot of things if you don’t vote.”

The clip went viral, amplified by other celebrities like Mark Ruffalo. So the MAGA forces swung into action on social media, accusing Henson and Ruffalo and other progressives of making it all up. “Is Project 2025 in the room with you?” a blue-checked user sneered under Ruffalo’s tweet. These efforts at gaslighting people run against a real problem, however: The drafters of Project 2025 seek to promote their authoritarian playbook. Thus, a simple Google search generates a slew of explainers from various news organizations, with even more coming out rapidly, as a response to the rising number of people asking, “What’s Project 2025?”

“We received a flood of reader inquiries asking if Project 2025 was a real effort,” the fact-checking team at Snopes wrote in their lengthy explainer published Tuesday. Google Trends confirms that the number of searches for “project 2025” has grown dramatically in recent days.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    112
    ·
    4 months ago

    It doesnt look like 2025 is assiciated with trump at all, just googling around. It looks like theyre endorsibg pence though

    • Laereht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Absolute cope and lie, unless you’re using a different Google that none of us have access to. This didn’t just happen. They’ve been talking about this for a while. Do more research or leave the conversation.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      To try and be helpful to you and others not as aware, here is some light reading.

      AP: A conservative leading the pro-Trump Project 2025 suggests there will be a new American Revolution

      Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts made the comments Tuesday on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, adding that Republicans are “in the process of taking this country back.”

      “And so I come full circle on this response and just want to encourage you with some substance that we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.

      Roberts’ remarks shed light on how a group that promises to have significant influence over a possible second term for former President Donald Trump is thinking about this moment in American politics. The Heritage Foundation is spearheading Project 2025, a sweeping road map for a new GOP administration that includes plans for dismantling aspects of the federal government and ousting thousands of civil servants in favor of Trump loyalists who will carry out a hard-right agenda without complaint.

      And here is some background of the past cooperation between Trump and the Heritage Foundation, as of their review of their shared agenda as of 2018. I selected something from back in his time as president to show actual cooperation with their agenda.

      Heritage.org: Trump Administration Embraces Heritage Foundation Policy Recommendations

      Over the past several months, Heritage’s executive branch relations staff reviewed the 334 policy recommendations and met with senior administration officials in the several agencies. Heritage analysts briefed administration officials on the recommendations, provided additional insight and information, and advocated for reform.

      Examples of some of the most notable policy recommendations and their adoption or implementation by the Trump administration include:

      • Leaving the Paris Climate Accord: In August 2017, Trump announced the U.S. was ending its funding and membership in the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
      • Repealing Net Neutrality: In December 2017, Trump’s Federal Communications Commission chairman proposed ending the 2015 network neutrality rules.
      • Reshaping National Monuments: Heritage’s recommendation to prohibit Land Acquisition (Cap and Reduce the Size of the Federal Estate) was adopted by Trump when he issued two executive orders effectively shrinking the size of national monuments in Utah.
      • Reinstating the Mexico City Policy: This executive order prevents taxpayer money from funding international groups involved in abortion and ending funding to the United Nations Population fund. On Jan. 23, 2017, in his first pro-life action, Trump signed an executive order today reinstating the Mexico City Policy.
      • Increasing Military Spending: Trump’s budget calls for a $54 billion increase in military spending to improve capacity, capability, and readiness of America’s armed forces.
      • Reforming Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF): The Trump administration adopted and is in favor of strengthening existing work requirements in order to receive benefits.
      • Allowing Development of Natural Resources: The Trump administration opened off-shore drilling and on federal lands. Executive Order 13783 directed Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to commence federal land coal leasing activities.
      • Reforming Government Agencies: Trump tasked each of his Cabinet secretaries to prepare detailed plans on how they propose to reduce the scope and size of their respective departments while streamlining services and ensuring each department runs more efficiently and handles tax dollars appropriately.
      • Withdrawing from UNESCO: In October 2017, Trump announced he was putting an end to U.S. membership in the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

      I recommend reading both those full short articles and using that as a jumping off point for further reading into points most relevant to you and your ideological goals. I hope that is helpful to you and anyone else.

    • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It doesnt look like 2025 is assiciated with trump at all, just googling around.

      Either you’re absolute shit at even basic information retrieval or you’re fucking lying. So which one is it, are you incompetent or malicious? (And no, that’s not an exclusive “or”)

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        41
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s plenty of articles saying he is, but neither one actually says there’s a link.

        • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Project 2025 can’t outright endorse Trump because it’d be illegal you fucking cabbage, but anybody with more than two neurons to rub together should be able to piece together the fact that yes, Project 2025 does in fact fully back Trump and generally comprises of hardcore Trumpists.

          Jesus fuck I don’t even know why I bother, it’s not like any of this is going to get through to you.

          • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You bother because if you don’t, this shithead might actually convince some people who if they were any dumber they’d need to be watered twice a week of his shitty lie.

            • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              That sort of intellectual dishonesty just really fucking activates my almonds. Like, I have absolutely no problem with ignorance, because not knowing something doesn’t mean you’re stupid or let alone malicious, just that you haven’t had an opportunity to learn about it, but this sort of “well I looked into it and turns out that black is white and up is down” twaddle is just… argh.

              The reality of what Project 2025 is about is on full public display (they even have their own domain) and it’s so blatantly obvious that it’s essentially “institutionalized Trumpism”. Yeah there’s apparently been some friction lately, but anybody who thinks those people don’t fully back Trump is lying to themselves and others so much that it’s not even funny.

    • ganksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Heritage foundation wants results. Trump has been their boon since he let them lay the groundwork for judges. They are opportunists. If he’s in office, he’s their man.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pro-tip: Pence is not running, and none of Project 2025 happens if Biden wins.

      What on earth makes you think it’s not about Trump?

    • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Project 2025: Next time a Republican gets Control of the White House we’re Destroying this Country!

      You: There’s no link to Project 2025 and the Republican Nominee!

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It is a document produced by his official transition organization. Every campaign has a transition team, separate from the campaign.

      They don’t usually give it a name. They don’t usually get it up and running this far ahead of the election. And it’s never before been a fascist playbook to end liberty in America and sell out democracy on this earth.