Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending Sunday 7 July 2024 - eviltoast

Need to make a primal scream without gathering footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh facts of Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Eh, there’s a chance that machine learning might help here… there’s some interesting stuff come out of that area of research, like radio antennae and rocket engines and so on, but I’d bet anything that a) no LLMs were involved and none ever will be, and b) “ai” only appears in marketing copy and funding pitches.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      dunno about rockets, but antenna thingy works only because you can simulate performance of antenna very reliably, precisely and quickly. This data was fed back, random small changes were made, things that were an improvement passed to the next iteration. Not sure how this approach is called but none of it is LLM

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        “genetic algorithm” - something I hadn’t previously seen branded as “AI”, but I guess I’m not surprised

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          GAs went out of the limelight before the rest of the beaus of current “AI” branding came to be, suspect that might be part of it

          (Another suspicion is that it’s because they’re…fairly observable, ito operation? So it’s far less easily claimable that one of these has gained sentience, or all the other dumb bullshit that the cluster has spun in recent years)