You acting that childish â proudly â is honestly making me sad in real life.
The implication of the first comment of this thread is that there are âboth sidesâ to this. There arenât. Who exactly is saying âPalestine is committing a genocide on Israelis?â
Trying to pretend both sides are in any way âas badâ is exactly the type of shitty propaganda Israel keeps pushing. The same type of rhetoric the Nazis used. Itâs so fucking ironic that Jewish people are now committing the heinous crimes they were the victims of 100 years ago.
The implication of the first comment of this thread is that there are âboth sidesâ to this. There arenât. Who exactly is saying âPalestine is committing a genocide on Israelis?â
what an incredibly naive and basic take on a geo political (historical) conflict that is still ongoing.
If weâre going to analyze this from a clinical perspective, as would be implied by âboth sidesâ we need to consider the actions of both sides, independently to each other. In a manner that is unrelated. This is the only way to truly âboth sidesâ something.
Looking at it in any other capacity is entirely irresponsible and disingenuous at best.
Only a literal child considers both sides exclusively in the capacity of âgenocideâ in this case. This is like saying that the US won the space race because we got to the moon and back, with people. Even though the USSR did literally everything else before the US did.
Only a literal child considers both sides exclusively in the capacity of âgenocideâ in this case. This is like saying that the US won the space race because we got to the moon and back, with people. Even though the USSR did literally everything else before the US did.
Even a lot of literal children realise that trying to equate Israel and Palestine as being equally guilty here is not like comparing the US space program to the Sovietâs. Itâs more like comparing the US space program to the Ghanan space program.
You just canât accept any fault on Israelâs part, because youâre a pathetic genocide denier, denying rape and slaughter of children.
The report holds the Israeli occupation responsible for the ongoing catastrophic situation in Gaza. But it also alludes to the possibility that October 7 is a watershed moment for even harsher Israeli occupation unless international law is urgently implemented.
Israel is sanctioned for committing âcrimes against humanity of extermination, gender persecution targeting Palestinian men and boys, murder, forcible transfer, and torture and inhuman and cruel treatment.â
In clear and deliberate violation of international law, Israel intended to commit these crimes: to murder civilians en masse, inflict wide-scale civilian destruction, and collectively punish and dehumanize Palestinians in Gaza. Palestinians were murdered. They didnât die as collateral damage or as unintended victims of Israeli military operations, but as Israelâs deliberate targets.
There the truth goes, being objective again. ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
Even a lot of literal children realise that trying to equate Israel and Palestine as being equally guilty here is not like comparing the US space program to the Sovietâs. Itâs more like comparing the US space program to the Ghanan space program.
iâm not equating them.
You just canât accept any fault on Israelâs part,
i have, numerous times. Youâre just lying through your teeth here.
i like how the section you block quote doesnt even once mention the word âgenocideâ in it. Youâre still pulling it out of your ass.
i have, numerous times. Youâre just lying through your teeth here.
Iâm still on the edge of whether youâre incredibly stupid or actually that bad at lying.
So you admit that Israel is undeniably indiscriminately bombing civilians, like all the reports show? And you wonât start rambling and equivocating with the exact garbage that Israel tries to deny these accusations with?
>The report holds the Israeli occupation responsible for the ongoing catastrophic situation in Gaza. But it also alludes to the possibility that October 7 is a watershed moment for even harsher Israeli occupation unless international law is urgently implemented.
>Israel is sanctioned for committing âcrimes against humanity of extermination, gender persecution targeting Palestinian men and boys, murder, forcible transfer, and torture and inhuman and cruel treatment.â
>In clear and deliberate violation of international law, Israel intended to commit these crimes: to murder civilians en masse, inflict wide-scale civilian destruction, and collectively punish and dehumanize Palestinians in Gaza. Palestinians were murdered. They didnât die as collateral damage or as unintended victims of Israeli military operations, but as Israelâs deliberate targets.
So if youâre not disavowing that, you understand and agree that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity. But you donât, so youâll continue with some other pathetic grade-school level attempt at saying youâre not saying what youâre saying.
Iâm still on the edge of whether youâre incredibly stupid or actually that bad at lying.
go read through my posts, youâll find the shit iâm talking about.
So you admit that Israel is undeniably indiscriminately bombing civilians, like all the reports show? And you wonât start rambling and equivocating with the exact garbage that Israel tries to deny these accusations with?
ignoring the fact that youâre treating your point like the ultimate source of authority (yet another fallacy, i donât even know what it is, but this is almost definitely a fallacy lmao)
And ignoring your rather loaded definitions and statements here which is obviously an intentional tactic of yours, whether you realize it or not.
Statistically, israel is bombing, and likewise, killing considerable amounts of civilians throughout the period of this conflict. Whether or not this is definable as âindiscriminateâ killing is debatable, because that makes it sound like theyâre sending bombs into fucking public libraries in america or something.
However, funny story, this is the middle east, and weâre engaging in extreme urban guerilla warfare tactics here. There is simply no way to counter these without substantial loss of life, or putting your military force at considerable risk. You might just argue that you should send personnel into the urban environments to directly counter them, but this is basically going to be a suicide mission. The only trivial ways to counter these are going to be infantry vehicles, or tanks, and bombing. Thatâs it.
And no, iâm not rambling, this is a conflict that has well over 50 years of history, close to 70 in the modern era. Arguably going all the way back to the very founding of religion itself. There is no âsimpleâ answer here.
UN Commission Finds Israel Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity
nice source btw, literally states that hamas has committed multiple war crimes LUL. fascinatingly the block text chunk youâre quoting doesnât seem to exist. That or ctrl f is shitting itself.
interestingly enough you say it finds them guilty, but again, not a single mention of guilty within the report itself. The report does mention, at least a few times, that israel has committed war crimes, but amusingly it mentions hamas quite a bit as well. Curious that you arenât talking about the âhamas genocideâ on jewish people (or israeli citizens, but that wouldnât be a conflation now would it?) during the time of this conflict.
you understand and agree that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity.
i donât quite believe this statement, again youâre doing the funny weaselly wording. I believe that israel has committed war crimes, like hamas, but i donât believe, and i donât know of any corroborating evidence that demonstrates that Israel is legally guilty and charged of committing war crimes. But again, that wouldnât suit your narrative, and it undermines your statement, so youâll continue using incorrect wording and statements to try and adhere to your framework huh?
I donât know if youâre genuinely trying to conflate âisrael is legally guilty and charged of comitting war crimesâ with âisrael has committed war crimesâ in order to later conflate it with âisrael is committing genocideâ in an effort to âconvertâ me, but by that point youâll have deconstructed your argument thrice, and it will have so little remaining value that it wonât matter.
you understand and agree that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity.
i donât quite believe this statement,
Oh youâre denying that Israel is guilty of anything, just alleged to have been doing naughty things? Iâm shocked. Yeah, thatâs exactly the point of this whole thread. Youâre a pathetic defender of crimes against humanity because youâre too much of a pussy to take the stand you know is the moral one, because you have relationships with people whom youâre not brave enough to disagree with.
go read through my posts, youâll find the shit iâm talking about.
Thereâs not enough money in this world for me to go and read the brainfarts of a person like you.
Oh youâre denying that Israel is guilty of anything, just alleged to have been doing naughty things? Iâm shocked. Yeah, thatâs exactly the point of this whole thread. Youâre a pathetic defender of crimes against humanity because youâre too much of a pussy to take the stand you know is the moral one, because you have relationships with people whom youâre not brave enough to disagree with.
you: âi believe that the sky is blueâ
me: âyeah but it depends on how we define believe, and how we define blue, along with how we classify the concept of âseeingâ color.â
you: âwell youâre just a fucking retard who doesnât understand how perception works, you must be denying the concept of blue existing in its entiretyâ
iâm disagreeing with the shitty way you word your statements, and then reconstructing them to provide my answer to what that question realistically should be.
And to be clear here, you very subtly diverged from using the term âwar crimesâ and transitioned into using âcrimes against humanityâ Which are two VERY different things. We agree that there are war crimes taking place. You keep trying to semantically undermine my statements and arguments so that you can say âi agree with youâ even though it makes me look hypocritical, specifically through the mechanism of silent semantic corrections. Arguably this is equivocation, because youâre subtly stating that war crimes = crimes against humanity.
Thereâs not enough money in this world for me to go and read the brainfarts of a person like you.
yet youâve done it, again, and again, and again, and again. For some reason you keep fucking responding to me, even though you just keep digging yourself a deeper hole for me to classify your argumentative mechanisms into.
you also keep (amusingly) accusing me of being too frail to simply, make my own decision, even though literally all you do is (incorrectly) reiterate what other people have said. Have you been to gaza? Or israel? No? Thatâs weird.
So angry at me and sore at losing the argument that instead of just replying with your usual garbage, you replied to three different comments of mine; one on a completely different post (so you got so mad you started stalking my profile, hahahah), then this one, and lastly in the actual thread itself.
Just a proudly American fool whoâs denying that Israel is committing war crimes like these.
People like you disgust me, but as I donât want to be as shit of a person as you, I actually reply in good faith. People like you just tie yourself in knots.
So angry at me and sore at losing the argument that instead of just replying with your usual garbage, you replied to three different comments of mine; one on a completely different post (so you got so mad you started stalking my profile, hahahah), then this one, and lastly in the actual thread itself.
if weâre being factually accurate here, it should be four no? You left two comments in reply to one comment i made that i split into two separate ones due to word limit. And then i responded to this one, and another one about harry potter, and possibly a fifth one, though iâd have to go check it to be sure.
Just a proudly American fool whoâs denying that Israel is committing war crimes like these.
demonstrate it.
nice copy pasta btw, try harder. Youâre clearly tired from being wrong so often.
Ofc I copy the piece of comment I wrote because youâre so desperate not to address those links, as your brainwashing just wonât allow you to.
itâs not the written material that i have a problem with, itâs fine, youâre the fucking problem because you keep mischaracterizing and completely ignoring what it says. Itâs not my fault youâre stupid.
You keep acting like iâm disavowing what the material says (strawman btw) and then ignoring what i saw about what youâve written, which is completely fucking asinine.
âIâm reiterating that I canât address any of the proof of Israel massacring children, torturing and raping people, because Iâd make my dad angry. But despite me denying the torture, rape, child massacre, forced transfer, etc, Iâm actually not denying any reality at all.â
Okay buddy.
So you donât think Israel massacres children or rapes and tortures people?
You wonât be able to take a side, on anything. Because you know youâre on the wrong side.
iâm disavowing what the material says
You do. You canât engage with it, because you know what the truth of the situation is. You know that I have dozens of links to UN high office reports and the only thing you can actually answer with is âb-b-b-b-b-but Hamas!â
Have you heard about âwhataboutismâ?
If youâre not disavowing any of it, then reiterate what they say, so we know that you agree. You wonât though, because youâre a genocide denier and actually admitting any of those criteria of genocide is just something youâre not capable of doing. Utterly brainwashed.
Theyâre called the âdemocratic peoples republic of koreaâ Likewise, the âPRCâ is âpeoples republic of chinaâ which is, closer to being true, but not true.
Israel is called âisraelâ hmmm. Yeah no this one doesnât follow. If weâre arguing semantic technicalities here, yeah sure itâs a republic, and not a democratic system, but thatâs just a democratic system with one extra step
âIâm reiterating that I canât address any of the proof of Israel massacring children, torturing and raping people, because Iâd make my dad angry. But despite me denying the torture, rape, child massacre, forced transfer, etc, Iâm actually not denying any reality at all.â
hmm, funny, i dont remember saying that, point me to where i said that specifically?
So you donât think Israel massacres children or rapes and tortures people?
bro literally every country in the world does this, even by fucking proxy. Serial killers live everywhere
Even fucking japan. Just look back at ww2 history and see what they were up to at the time.
You wonât be able to take a side, on anything.
you really shouldnât take a side on anything. Taking a side on everything is a sign of weakness and societal conformance.
. You do. You canât engage with it, because you know what the truth of the situation is. You know that I have dozens of links to UN high office reports and the only thing you can actually answer with is âb-b-b-b-b-but Hamas!â
I donât and cool mischaracterization of my quote btw. Very slimy. Again, i have nothing to say regarding the material, because itâs all fucking legal paperwork, none of which says much of anything regarding substance in relation to the conflict here. I have yet to find a single fucking case, of anything youâve linked directly corroborating what youâve said.
You say something, and then link a block quote as a source, and it doesnât even fucking backup what youâre saying.
Have you heard about âwhataboutismâ?
my friend from the city under water. You have literally accused me of denying genocide, and derided me from the very first fucking comment i made. With every fucking comment youâve said you started with âyou genocide defending fucks make me sick to my stomachâ
Some commentators have defended the usage of whataboutism and tu quoque in certain contexts. Whataboutism can provide necessary context into whether or not a particular line of critique is relevant or fair, and behavior that may be imperfect by international standards may be appropriate in a given geopolitical neighborhood.
Accusing an interlocutor of whataboutism can also in itself be manipulative and serve the motive of discrediting, as critical talking points can be used selectively and purposefully even as the starting point of the conversation
oops.
I would not suggest such a thing were it not for the Whatabouts. These are the people who answer every condemnation of the Provisional I.R.A. with an argument to prove the greater immorality of the âenemyâ, and therefore the justice of the Provisionalsâ cause: âWhat about Bloody Sunday, internment, torture, force-feeding, army intimidation?â. Every call to stop is answered in the same way: âWhat about the Treaty of Limerick; the Anglo-Irish treaty of 1921; Lenadoon?â. Neither is the Church immune: âThe Catholic Church has never supported the national cause. What about Papal sanction for the Norman invasion; condemnation of the Fenians by Moriarty; Parnell?â
oh no, even the relevant quote literally supports what i fucking say. I have not once said that hamas is worse than israel, or that israel is worse than hamas.
In 1978, Australian journalist Michael Bernard wrote a column in The Age applying the term whataboutism to the Soviet Unionâs tactics of deflecting any criticism of its human rights abuses. Merriam-Webster details that âthe association of whataboutism with the Soviet Union began during the Cold War. As the regimes of [Joseph] Stalin and his successors were criticized by the West for human rights atrocities, the Soviet propaganda machine would be ready with a comeback alleging atrocities of equal reprehensibility for which the West was guilty.â
oh no, yet another proper example of a whataboutism.
then reiterate what they say
i already have, they say that there is reasonable grounds for israel to have been, or to commit genocide. Likewise, there is supporting evidence of âwar crimesâ being committed.
You wonât though, because youâre a genocide denier and actually admitting any of those criteria of genocide is just something youâre not capable of doing. Utterly brainwashed.
I agree you absolutely have been arguing in bad faith this entire thread.
You acting that childish â proudly â is honestly making me sad in real life.
The implication of the first comment of this thread is that there are âboth sidesâ to this. There arenât. Who exactly is saying âPalestine is committing a genocide on Israelis?â
Trying to pretend both sides are in any way âas badâ is exactly the type of shitty propaganda Israel keeps pushing. The same type of rhetoric the Nazis used. Itâs so fucking ironic that Jewish people are now committing the heinous crimes they were the victims of 100 years ago.
what an incredibly naive and basic take on a geo political (historical) conflict that is still ongoing.
If weâre going to analyze this from a clinical perspective, as would be implied by âboth sidesâ we need to consider the actions of both sides, independently to each other. In a manner that is unrelated. This is the only way to truly âboth sidesâ something.
Looking at it in any other capacity is entirely irresponsible and disingenuous at best.
Only a literal child considers both sides exclusively in the capacity of âgenocideâ in this case. This is like saying that the US won the space race because we got to the moon and back, with people. Even though the USSR did literally everything else before the US did.
Even a lot of literal children realise that trying to equate Israel and Palestine as being equally guilty here is not like comparing the US space program to the Sovietâs. Itâs more like comparing the US space program to the Ghanan space program.
You just canât accept any fault on Israelâs part, because youâre a pathetic genocide denier, denying rape and slaughter of children.
UN Commission Finds Israel Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity
There the truth goes, being objective again. ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
iâm not equating them.
i have, numerous times. Youâre just lying through your teeth here.
i like how the section you block quote doesnt even once mention the word âgenocideâ in it. Youâre still pulling it out of your ass.
Iâm still on the edge of whether youâre incredibly stupid or actually that bad at lying.
So you admit that Israel is undeniably indiscriminately bombing civilians, like all the reports show? And you wonât start rambling and equivocating with the exact garbage that Israel tries to deny these accusations with?
UN Commission Finds Israel Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity
So if youâre not disavowing that, you understand and agree that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity. But you donât, so youâll continue with some other pathetic grade-school level attempt at saying youâre not saying what youâre saying.
go read through my posts, youâll find the shit iâm talking about.
ignoring the fact that youâre treating your point like the ultimate source of authority (yet another fallacy, i donât even know what it is, but this is almost definitely a fallacy lmao)
And ignoring your rather loaded definitions and statements here which is obviously an intentional tactic of yours, whether you realize it or not.
Statistically, israel is bombing, and likewise, killing considerable amounts of civilians throughout the period of this conflict. Whether or not this is definable as âindiscriminateâ killing is debatable, because that makes it sound like theyâre sending bombs into fucking public libraries in america or something.
However, funny story, this is the middle east, and weâre engaging in extreme urban guerilla warfare tactics here. There is simply no way to counter these without substantial loss of life, or putting your military force at considerable risk. You might just argue that you should send personnel into the urban environments to directly counter them, but this is basically going to be a suicide mission. The only trivial ways to counter these are going to be infantry vehicles, or tanks, and bombing. Thatâs it.
And no, iâm not rambling, this is a conflict that has well over 50 years of history, close to 70 in the modern era. Arguably going all the way back to the very founding of religion itself. There is no âsimpleâ answer here.
nice source btw, literally states that hamas has committed multiple war crimes LUL. fascinatingly the block text chunk youâre quoting doesnât seem to exist. That or ctrl f is shitting itself.
interestingly enough you say it finds them guilty, but again, not a single mention of guilty within the report itself. The report does mention, at least a few times, that israel has committed war crimes, but amusingly it mentions hamas quite a bit as well. Curious that you arenât talking about the âhamas genocideâ on jewish people (or israeli citizens, but that wouldnât be a conflation now would it?) during the time of this conflict.
i donât quite believe this statement, again youâre doing the funny weaselly wording. I believe that israel has committed war crimes, like hamas, but i donât believe, and i donât know of any corroborating evidence that demonstrates that Israel is legally guilty and charged of committing war crimes. But again, that wouldnât suit your narrative, and it undermines your statement, so youâll continue using incorrect wording and statements to try and adhere to your framework huh?
I donât know if youâre genuinely trying to conflate âisrael is legally guilty and charged of comitting war crimesâ with âisrael has committed war crimesâ in order to later conflate it with âisrael is committing genocideâ in an effort to âconvertâ me, but by that point youâll have deconstructed your argument thrice, and it will have so little remaining value that it wonât matter.
Oh youâre denying that Israel is guilty of anything, just alleged to have been doing naughty things? Iâm shocked. Yeah, thatâs exactly the point of this whole thread. Youâre a pathetic defender of crimes against humanity because youâre too much of a pussy to take the stand you know is the moral one, because you have relationships with people whom youâre not brave enough to disagree with.
Thereâs not enough money in this world for me to go and read the brainfarts of a person like you.
you: âi believe that the sky is blueâ
me: âyeah but it depends on how we define believe, and how we define blue, along with how we classify the concept of âseeingâ color.â
you: âwell youâre just a fucking retard who doesnât understand how perception works, you must be denying the concept of blue existing in its entiretyâ
iâm disagreeing with the shitty way you word your statements, and then reconstructing them to provide my answer to what that question realistically should be.
And to be clear here, you very subtly diverged from using the term âwar crimesâ and transitioned into using âcrimes against humanityâ Which are two VERY different things. We agree that there are war crimes taking place. You keep trying to semantically undermine my statements and arguments so that you can say âi agree with youâ even though it makes me look hypocritical, specifically through the mechanism of silent semantic corrections. Arguably this is equivocation, because youâre subtly stating that war crimes = crimes against humanity.
yet youâve done it, again, and again, and again, and again. For some reason you keep fucking responding to me, even though you just keep digging yourself a deeper hole for me to classify your argumentative mechanisms into.
you also keep (amusingly) accusing me of being too frail to simply, make my own decision, even though literally all you do is (incorrectly) reiterate what other people have said. Have you been to gaza? Or israel? No? Thatâs weird.
So angry at me and sore at losing the argument that instead of just replying with your usual garbage, you replied to three different comments of mine; one on a completely different post (so you got so mad you started stalking my profile, hahahah), then this one, and lastly in the actual thread itself.
Just a proudly American fool whoâs denying that Israel is committing war crimes like these.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/240520-panel-report-eng.pdf https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/06/04/israel-50-years-occupation-abuses
Oh, right, sorry, I just remembered youâre proudly ignorant and probably your literacy matches that attitude, so something⊠more to your level:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes_in_the_IsraelâHamas_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_the_Gaza_Strip
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_schools_during_the_Israeli_invasion_of_Gaza
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_health_facilities_during_the_IsraelâHamas_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israeli_airstrikes_on_municipal_services_in_the_Gaza_Strip
People like you disgust me, but as I donât want to be as shit of a person as you, I actually reply in good faith. People like you just tie yourself in knots.
if weâre being factually accurate here, it should be four no? You left two comments in reply to one comment i made that i split into two separate ones due to word limit. And then i responded to this one, and another one about harry potter, and possibly a fifth one, though iâd have to go check it to be sure.
demonstrate it.
nice copy pasta btw, try harder. Youâre clearly tired from being wrong so often.
Just a proudly American fool whoâs denying that Israel is committing war crimes like these.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/240520-panel-report-eng.pdf https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/06/04/israel-50-years-occupation-abuses
Oh, right, sorry, I just remembered youâre proudly ignorant and probably your literacy matches that attitude, so something⊠more to your level:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes_in_the_IsraelâHamas_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_the_Gaza_Strip
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_schools_during_the_Israeli_invasion_of_Gaza
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_health_facilities_during_the_IsraelâHamas_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israeli_airstrikes_on_municipal_services_in_the_Gaza_Strip
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
Get a grip. You get you panties in a row when someone points out what a scumbag fascist state Israel is, and the warcrimes they commit.
Ofc I copy the piece of comment I wrote because youâre so desperate not to address those links, as your brainwashing just wonât allow you to.
ah yes, 1000 USD to anyone who can find an example of this (this post is not legally binding)
israel is literally democratic. Fascism, is a fucking dictatorship bro. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#Government_and_politics
itâs not the written material that i have a problem with, itâs fine, youâre the fucking problem because you keep mischaracterizing and completely ignoring what it says. Itâs not my fault youâre stupid.
You keep acting like iâm disavowing what the material says (strawman btw) and then ignoring what i saw about what youâve written, which is completely fucking asinine.
âIsrael is literally democraticâ
North Korea claims the same.
âIâm reiterating that I canât address any of the proof of Israel massacring children, torturing and raping people, because Iâd make my dad angry. But despite me denying the torture, rape, child massacre, forced transfer, etc, Iâm actually not denying any reality at all.â
Okay buddy.
So you donât think Israel massacres children or rapes and tortures people?
You wonât be able to take a side, on anything. Because you know youâre on the wrong side.
You do. You canât engage with it, because you know what the truth of the situation is. You know that I have dozens of links to UN high office reports and the only thing you can actually answer with is âb-b-b-b-b-but Hamas!â
Have you heard about âwhataboutismâ?
If youâre not disavowing any of it, then reiterate what they say, so we know that you agree. You wonât though, because youâre a genocide denier and actually admitting any of those criteria of genocide is just something youâre not capable of doing. Utterly brainwashed.
this is actually not true, like at all.
Theyâre called the âdemocratic peoples republic of koreaâ Likewise, the âPRCâ is âpeoples republic of chinaâ which is, closer to being true, but not true.
Israel is called âisraelâ hmmm. Yeah no this one doesnât follow. If weâre arguing semantic technicalities here, yeah sure itâs a republic, and not a democratic system, but thatâs just a democratic system with one extra step
hmm, funny, i dont remember saying that, point me to where i said that specifically?
bro literally every country in the world does this, even by fucking proxy. Serial killers live everywhere
Even fucking japan. Just look back at ww2 history and see what they were up to at the time.
you really shouldnât take a side on anything. Taking a side on everything is a sign of weakness and societal conformance.
I donât and cool mischaracterization of my quote btw. Very slimy. Again, i have nothing to say regarding the material, because itâs all fucking legal paperwork, none of which says much of anything regarding substance in relation to the conflict here. I have yet to find a single fucking case, of anything youâve linked directly corroborating what youâve said.
You say something, and then link a block quote as a source, and it doesnât even fucking backup what youâre saying.
my friend from the city under water. You have literally accused me of denying genocide, and derided me from the very first fucking comment i made. With every fucking comment youâve said you started with âyou genocide defending fucks make me sick to my stomachâ
oops.
oh no, even the relevant quote literally supports what i fucking say. I have not once said that hamas is worse than israel, or that israel is worse than hamas.
oh no, yet another proper example of a whataboutism.
i already have, they say that there is reasonable grounds for israel to have been, or to commit genocide. Likewise, there is supporting evidence of âwar crimesâ being committed.
oops you did the thing you werent supposed to.