CNN's debate was no fair fight - eviltoast

I don’t know what was wrong with Joe Biden. It’s hard to imagine that they ever would have asked for a debate if this was the way he is normally. We’ve seen him recently holding press conferences and giving speeches and he seemed to be fine. They said he had a cold so maybe he really was on drugs — Nyquil or Mucinex or something that made him seem so shaky and frail. Whatever it was, it was a terrible debate for him and if he does stay in the race (which is almost certain in my opinion) the campaign is going to have a lot of work to do to dig out of the hole that was dug last night. The media smells blood and they are circling like a bunch of starved piranhas.

. . . For some odd reason, moderator Jake Tapper told Trump in the beginning that he didn’t need to answer the questions and that he could use the time however he wanted. Trump ran with that, essentially giving a rally speech whenever he had the floor and was unresponsive to the vast majority of the questions. He made faces and insulted Biden to his face, at one point calling him a criminal and a Manchurian candidate. If anyone had said 10 years ago that this would happen at a presidential debate they would have been laughed out of the room.

After the debate when most of the country had turned off cable news or gone to bed, CNN aired its fact check. And it’s a doozy:

It sure would have been good if even some of that epic litany of lies could have been checked while people were still watching. The decision to have the moderators sit like a couple of potted plants woodenly asking questions about child care while Trump responded with irrelevant lies was inexplicable. Why did they even bother to ask questions at all? They could have just run the timer and let the candidates talk for two minutes each about anything they wanted. It probably would have been more enlightening.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    At what point does a person recognize and admit that Biden or trump, we lose?

    If someone is only going to do the least they possibly can, vote in the election, when should they stop trying to pick the least harmful winner and instead start working towards an alternative?

    If all a person will do is vote then is t it most important to record their policy preferences in the only way that can’t be glossed over, lied about or deepfaked?

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      These are not equivalent losses. I think that’s what you’re not getting. Biden wins we get a senile leader with near dementia in charge for 4 years. Trump wins we get a Russian puppet who would literally kick start an insurrection over admitting his own losses. These are not the same thing, although both objectively suck.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Okay so if you really believe that trump is a foreign asset who will attempt a coup then why are you worried who people vote for?

        You ought to be pushing people to prepare to defend themselves and the country from January 6 part 2, not vote in an election whose results won’t matter (because the foreign asset led coup attempt will have to be defeated).

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Attempt a coup? Did we not live through the same January 6th. He already bloody did. And we still haven’t locked him up for it.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            wow, maybe you ought to hold the biden administrations feet to the fire on that! i bet a person who was president could do something about it no problem!