"Soundblaster" was such an 80s/90s name for a computer part. - eviltoast
  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 months ago

    And of course there was a short period of time where a sound card wasn’t required, but would actually improve performance by offloading audio processing to your sound card if you had one. And onboard audio at that time wasn’t great anyways.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You can still get discrete sound cards (both internal and USB), though they’re more for audiophile stuff. With the PS5 touting big 3d audio improvements and HRTFs I half expected manufacturers to make a push to bring them back or at least feature sound features more prominantly in motherboards but I guess CPUs these days can just spare the cycles if you want fancy audio.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Generating music still benefits from offloading to discrete devices though. Like using a synth or multitrack stuff.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Modern CPUs can do all the audio processing you’d ever need (maybe barring some professional use cases like making music or editing a movie).

        Audiophile external audio devices are just doing the conversion from a digital signal to an analogue signal.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Oh god AC97 era onboard audio was just bad, there was always weird glitchy sounds coming from interference elsewhere on the motherboard

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      And of course there was a short period of time where a sound card wasn’t required, but would actually improve performance by offloading audio processing to your sound card if you had one

      we are at this point in history, but for graphics cards :)

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not in the same way, as you aren’t using the integrated gpu at all if you get an external one. I guess if you’re talking about shared ram this makes sense though.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I seem to recall the integrated sound wasn’t used either, when I had my sound card in - the audio connectors were going directly into the sound card.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            yea, IDK how it works as I’ve never had a computer back then, but the quoted reply makes it sound like getting a sound card would take load off of the CPU.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              oh - my apologies, I forgot that on-board graphics have a dedicated chipset. Also, no idea whether on-board sound would have used CPU power back in the late days of soundcards, as the comment I responded to was claiming… might have been a sound chip for that, too…

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I remember Battlefield 2 being a prime example for that. Not only did its performance improve once I added a discrete sound card, it also sounded much better.