Ah Bernie, what could have been... - eviltoast
  • doughless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    But you did say she moved “too far” left - if it was her itsy bitsy move left that caused non-voter protests, that is literally by definition “too far.”

    But you’re misidentifying the cause here, while somehow still ending up at the right conclusion.

    She very well may have lost because of non-voter protestors, but it was because she wasn’t far enough left. And if Hillary had actually moved further left to win those protestors’ votes, she would have lost the center vote. And Biden may very well lose for the same reason, so the lesson should be if you don’t want Trump to win, then don’t protest vote simply because Biden isn’t far enough left.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      too far

      Ctrl+F “too far” and 0 results. Nope I didn’t say “too far”.

      What I’m saying is that she stuck her head a tiny bit left, and guess what happened? The voters didn’t turn out. They protest no-voted. As in, the left voters never show up. (or excruciatingly rarely) Candidates at various times stick their head a tiny bit left trying to court those voters, but nope the voters don’t show up.

      You think they have to go even more, but every time they run left in any amount (either Gore or Hilary) the voters don’t show up. This is how it works, you go a little bit left, and see if you win. Sorry you don’t go extreme left to see if you win, you stick your toes in first. And every time the Dems do, they lose. So what does the next candidate learn? Don’t go left, because they don’t show up and you lose. They learn you go to the center to find votes.

      The message to left voters is: If you want things to move left, then you have to show up. The dems have learnt time and time again that you can’t count on left voters. So they go to the center to find voters. If you want things to move left, then give Dems consistent and overwhelming victories. You have to take small steps before big steps. You have to walk before you run. Not just president, congress too because again they will go center to find congress votes.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What I’m saying is that she stuck her head a tiny bit left, and guess what happened? The voters didn’t turn out.

        So you’re saying that she went too far left for the electorate right? Or are you saying her going left had no appreciable impact, because she didn’t go left at all and these massive paragraphs you’re writing are just an exercise in pretending to be a LLM?

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              What is going on here. She went a little bit left and lost (because the left voters didn’t show up). So the next candidate learns to go to the center to find voters (because the left voters don’t show up). Every single time.

              I just went to find and link my explanation to someone else just to find that it’s what you responded to. If you don’t get it then you are really trying hard to not get it and/or discussing in bad faith. Ciao.

              • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I’m not arguing in bad faith, you’re making an argument that has zero substance to it. There’s not a fucking argument to be had here.

                If you’re saying both simultaneously that Hilary went left and that she didn’t go left, you’re just arguing with yourself.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You walk before you run. You take small steps before big steps. That is how it works. Why am I bothering, I’m out.

      • doughless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Okay, it sounds like you’re saying the same thing - that Hillary tried to convince left wing voters she is on their side, and they protested because it “wasn’t enough.” Your original statement made it sound like she lost because she tried to move slightly left.

          • doughless@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            No, they protested in spite of her trying to move left, not because she tried to move left.

            Although I’ll admit it’s a distinction without a difference. Democrats are going to continue to refuse to move farther left if we don’t vote because we think they’re not left enough.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re making no sense. Protest no vote in spite of her moving a little bit left is an oxymoron. Unless you meant protest no vote to spite her. In which case it doesn’t matter because of exactly what I’m saying, left voters don’t show up. You’d be an absolute fool to court voters that never show up, (again when you walk before you run). So candidates go to the center to find voters that do show up.

              • doughless@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Are you saying that if Hillary had rejected the map room proposal, then left wing voters would have turned out to vote for her?

                That’s ridiculous to think that moving further right would have got more left voters to turn out to vote.

                Meaning the map room proposal had no effect on left wing voters, because it wasn’t enough. It did not cause them to protest.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  No I’m not. I think you don’t know what “in spite of” means. The correct usage of that expression would be: “The far left wing wanted Hillary to move far left. But they voted for her anyway in spite of her only moving a little bit left.”

                  This entire conversation has been you (intentionally or otherwise) misreading and/or misinterpreting and/or twisting words, so I’m leaving this conversation. I think I’ve explained things well enough.

                  • doughless@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I still think this has been a useful conversion, because it has helped me understand what you actually meant to say.

                    What I think you’re trying to say is that moving left failed to prevent voters from protesting, which I’m completely in agreement here.

                    If courting left wing voters fails to get them out to vote, then politicians are just going to pander to center/right voters.

                    Your phrasing was just really weird, because you keep arguing that moving left is what triggered the voters to protest, but they would have protested either way.