I can't disagree. - eviltoast
  • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    But they mean specifically a vacancy tax. So anyone who owned vacant property would have a large additional payment or get it rented

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t see this working. Not only the property owners would transfer this cost to your monthly payments, the government would need an enormous bureaucracy to actually control and enforce this law. I don’t believe this is technically possible to achieve.