Trump asks court to delay setting trial date in documents case | CNN Politics - eviltoast
  • effingjoe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t disagree with your predictions, but the whole point is that public opinion won’t matter if the judge is not a hack. That is to say, who cares if Trump says it’s a witch hunt if he’s charged again in NJ? He’s already saying that.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s one thing to say “It’s all a witch hunt”. We’ve been hearing that for years.

      But it’s a completely different thing to say “It’s all a witch hunt! See what Jack Smith is doing?” when he can point to Smith filing cases in NJ because his FL case is at risk. And then you have the upcoming GA case. Is this all legitimate? Absolutely. But to someone who doesn’t follow this stuff significantly? It does give off the appearance that the government is just trying to throw whatever they can at as many walls as possible just to see what sticks. Especially if he follows this up with charges in DC stemming from the J6 investigation.

      Doing this accomplishes two things: One is that it’s going to galvanize his base and increase his support, which could lead to greater turnout at the polls. The other is that it increases his chances that one of his supporters will end up on one of the juries and push for jury nullification “to counter the government’s witch hunt”.

      This is why I say that this is the .00000001% of time where it matters.

      • effingjoe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I honestly don’t know what you’re arguing here. Are you saying the justice department should bow to public pressure and not attempt to hold Trump accountable for his actions?

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m saying that the way that the fact that he is filing multiple charges in multiple states is going to give off the impression that “it’s all a witch hunt”. It may be the only way he can do it (because of the crimes being committed in multiple states, etc.), and I’m not saying he’s wrong for doing it. But I am saying that it’s going to have the side effect of playing right into Trump’s hands in a way that is likely to help him in the general election (by incentivizing more of his supporters to vote and send him money), and possibly in at least one of his upcoming trials as well.

          • effingjoe@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you are vastly overestimating this effect. What subset of Trump supporters are not already all-in on supporting him, but would become so if he was charged with additional crimes in another state? (where those crimes took place.)