TIL the first Star Wars movie (A New Hope) was actually made after a book adaptation, which means Star Wars hype is technically literary-based in nature - eviltoast
  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Once again here to say I’m not saying the movie is based on the book. I, like you, just thought it was fascinating it turned out this way, and that we could wonder if the book is technically considered the beginning of Star Wars mania.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It is a fascinating story, but no, the book was not the beginning of the mania because the book did not sell well at all in advance of the movie. Movies always boost book sales, but the novelization of A New Hope had almost no sales until two months after the movie came out.

    • Bob1971@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      As for me personally, The book absolutely caused me and the wife to be there in line that Friday night when the movie finally came out Summer of '77. I don’t think it opened in May at my local theater. Did I mention there was a line? Did I mention there was a table full of merchandise? I should have got the t-shirt!
      Edit, Luke had an older brother in the book. Must have been cut out of the movie.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, it isn’t, since the screenplay the book was based on existed before, and that’s what George used for the movie; his own screenplay, not a book written based on his screenplay.