Solar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output power - eviltoast
  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s funny how all the FUD idiots say that solar panels will wind up in the landfill and shit like that

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a stupid argument against solar power, but it is a legitimate argument against cheap and poorly-constructed solar panels that do not have the same longevity as the ones built in the 90s.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        The one’s made now have plenty of longevity. They don’t base the replacement time on when they actually go bad, and as long as they’re not abused or get hit by bowling ball-sized hail or something, they’ll keep producing some kind of power for a long time. It’s just that for the space they take up, it may be worthwhile to replace them.

        Same with EV batteries. They might have limited range after 10 years, but they could still be useful for things like home backup power without having to do a whole recycling job.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But that’s the problem. Early adopters are starting to see the performance drops and are just replacing their equipment, and we don’t have a proper reuse pathway for a lot of it. We should prepare a plan for panel (and battery) repurposing to keep plastic and metals out of landfills. Recycling alone isn’t enough.

          Again, not a reason not to produce or adopt solar power and electric cars, but it is a legitimate second-level concern.

          That’s the tricky part with dismissing these concerns outright. Conservatives are not arguing in good faith, and take a kernel of truth surrounded by a mountain of bullshit. We don’t want to overcorrect and ignore the problems, because that just fuels the bullshit arguments.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sounds like a problem that a good capitalist could solve. Take old panels for next to nothing, sell them for reduced price to used market customers.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Is there a problem with the market being flooded with cheap not very good solar panels? Every single panel I looked at to put on my roof have all been of the highest quality I’ve not seen anyone try and hawk anything substandard.

        Unless of course they’re lying about what panels they’re using but realistically I can’t see that lasting for very long.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, we do have that problem, but it’s not the panels anyone puts on a roof. It’s the cheap plastic shit manufacturers put on disposable consumer devices like pathway lighting or portable chargers.

          I wouldn’t put that cheap shit on my roof, but as solar adoption increases, capitalists are gonna capitalize.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just read to the top comment saying it’s profitable to replace them anyway.