Sam Bankman-Fried living on bread and water because jail won't abide vegan diet, lawyer says - eviltoast

The co-founder of failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX pleaded not guilty to a seven count indictment charging him with wire fraud, securities fraud and money laundering.

An attorney for FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried said in federal court Tuesday his client has to subsist on bread, water and peanut butter because the jail he’s in isn’t accommodating his vegan diet.

  • Dave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The meals will (I assume) be allocated on inmate numbers, so the animal will be reared, killed, transported, then thrown in the trash because someone doesn’t want to eat it.

    More generally this is the weird ‘opt out’ culture of food, where vegan is considered the exceptional position, which is kinda stupid, in my opinion.

        • Harrison [He/Him]@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humans don’t need anything but nutrient slop to survive, but the prisons aim for something better largely because it keeps riots down.

          • Dave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but you could e.g. start with slop and then let people request something different. That’s what I meant by ‘default’. Perhaps there’s a better world?

            I sure there’s a fancy word in psychology, but it’s like if everyone is given choice x automatically, then it shouldn’t be a surprise that x seems to be what people prefer.

            I’ve noticed a similar thing in the Subway sandwich store: there are approximately the same number of vegetables and meats available, but if you look at the menu there is just one ‘veggie’ option, and a multitude of different meat combinations.

            • Harrison [He/Him]@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You could, but the only reason to do so would be to accommodate a small minority’s ethical dietary decisions, which is the opposite of a default.

              No one’s going to chose the slop so there’s no point in having it.

              As for subway, their menu is largely determined by sales. They do trial other options occasionally, and the ones that are popular stay.

              • Dave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Here’s the definition of default I’m using (from Google):

                a preselected option adopted by a computer program or other mechanism when no alternative is specified by the user or programmer. (weird it specifies “a computer program or other mechanism”, but whatever)

                My argument is that the default meal including meat is what makes including meat the most popular choice, not the other way around.

                • Harrison [He/Him]@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not weird that it specifies a computer program, the use of the term to mean the standard option comes from computing. It’s the value chosen when the computer defaults, as in fails to pay it’s debt (in this case debt being the value it was looking for).

                  I don’t think there’s any evidence to suggest that people prefer meat because it’s the default option and not the other way around.