Lauren Boebert loses it on debate moderator as he grills her on Beetlejuice lies - eviltoast
  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wouldn’t imagine even a privately owned business would qualify for privacy. I don’t expect any privacy when I’m walking around in Walmart.

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s about public access. If the public is generally allowed in a space, you have no expectation of privacy in that space. Anyone can have an eidetic memory, which is as good as having a camera in their hand. If they can hear it, see it, or reach it from a public space, you can’t consider it secure.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ok so for any of you confused about what would be an expected level of privacy while recording people in public with a cel phone:

      The person working the back office of Walmart crunching numbers where customers aren’t allowed has an expected level of privacy.

      The people using the bathroom in Walmart also have expected level of privacy.

      The people in the changing room has an expected level of privacy.

      If you were caught with a cel phone recording in any of these circumstances you could be persecuted for violating privacy.

      If however you’re walking around on the main floor of Walmart recording a person looking at the price on a can of beans, you’re safe from legal prosecution as far as privacy laws (although that isn’t to say you are safe from being charged as a stalker or harassment in a certain context) .

      And legally you could record what cops are doing out in public.