Gilbert was one of the experts consulted in drawing up the NSM-20 report, but she said it was taken out of their hands as it approached completion.
“Sometime at the end of April, the subject matter experts were taken off the report and we were told it would be edited at a higher level. So I did not know what was in the report until it came out,” she said. “But when the report came out, late on the Friday afternoon [on 10 May], I read it and I had to reread it. I had to go back and print out that section and read it, because I could not believe it stated so starkly that we assess that Israel is not blocking humanitarian assistance.
This seems pretty damning…
According to Democratic senator Chris Van Hollen, the NSM-20 report “should have been based on an unvarnished assessment of the facts and law.”
“Stacy Gilbert’s statements further corroborate the concerns I have expressed that the findings of the bureaus and experts most involved with the distribution of aid and compliance with international law were bypassed in favor of political convenience,” said Van Hollen.
I bet there are consequences, right? There will be consequences for sure. You can’t just lie about stuff like this without consequences. Imagine you’d say for example Iraq would kill babies in Kuwait to rationalize a war but it would be a lie, there would be harsh conseq… Ah, who am I kidding…
This seems pretty damning…
Yikes.
I bet there are consequences, right? There will be consequences for sure. You can’t just lie about stuff like this without consequences. Imagine you’d say for example Iraq would kill babies in Kuwait to rationalize a war but it would be a lie, there would be harsh conseq… Ah, who am I kidding…